Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 29 SEPTEMBER 2011

Direction To Pay Amounted To An Equitable Assignment

Charles Russell Speechlys LLP
Charles Russell Speechlys LLP
Contributor
Charles Russell Speechlys LLP

Charles Russell Speechlys LLP

Charles Russell Speechlys is an international law firm with a focus on private capital, at the...

View firm profile
Explore more from Charles Russell Speechlys LLP

This case concerned the transfer of Lucas Neill from Blackburn Rovers to West Ham. Mr. Harrison was acting for West Ham. In the agency agreement between the two, a commission of £900,000 was payable to Mr. Harrison in four annual instalments. Both parties were subject to the regulations of the Football Association.

United KingdomCorporate/Commercial Law

Burridge v MPH Soccer Management Limited [2011] EWCA Civ 835

This case concerned the transfer of Lucas Neill from Blackburn Rovers to West Ham. Mr. Harrison was acting for West Ham. In the agency agreement between the two, a commission of £900,000 was payable to Mr. Harrison in four annual instalments. Both parties were subject to the regulations of the Football Association. The regulations permit only individuals to be agents, but they do recognise that an individual may organise his business through a company. In the declaration of payment section in the agreement, the name of Mr. Harrison's company (MPH) was inserted, along with bank details. In due course Mr & Mrs Burridge obtained a third party debt order against MPH. The issue for decision in the Court of Appeal was whether the payment from West Ham at the time of the debt order was due to Harrison or MPH and, if it was due to Harrison, whether Harrison had assigned it to MPH before the date of the debt order.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from