Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 JANUARY 2018

Are You Sure?

A recent decision of the High Court has served as a useful reminder and warning to parties of the need to carefully draft contracts of suretyship ...

United KingdomCorporate/Commercial Law

A recent decision of the High Court has served as a useful reminder and warning to parties of the need to carefully draft contracts of suretyship, and the distinction between indemnities (primary obligations) and guarantees (secondary obligations).

In Ultrabank A/S v Jagatramka [2017] EWHC 2792 (Comm), Mr Justice Teare held that the language used in the contract was indicative of a primary liability and that it provided for an on demand bond which required the defendant to pay a sum to the claimant equal to that which his company was indebted.

The difference between suretyships of guarantee, and suretyships of indemnity

  • A guarantee is a promise to ensure that a third party fulfils its obligations and/or a promise to fulfil those obligations if that third party fails to do so. It is a contractual agreement that creates a secondary obligation to support a primary obligation of one party to another. The guarantor promises that the borrower will perform its

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from