Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 MARCH 2025

Are All Warranties Created The Same?

In Eurocopy plc v Teesdale [1992] BCLC 1067, the Court of Appeal suggested that actual knowledge, derived from sources outside of a disclosure letter, could undermine a claim for breach of warranty in a share purchase agreement despite any express provision to the contrary.

United KingdomCorporate/Commercial Law

In Eurocopy plc v Teesdale [1992] BCLC 1067, the Court of Appeal suggested that actual knowledge, derived from sources outside of a disclosure letter, could undermine a claim for breach of warranty in a share purchase agreement despite any express provision to the contrary. Consequently, it is considered best practice for a share purchase agreement (or any other acquisition agreement) to set out clearly the agreed position and the extent to which a buyer's knowledge should qualify any warranties.

But does this apply to any other commercial contracts?

Given the principles that gave rise to an arguable defence in Eurocopy plc v Teesdale [1992] BCLC 1067 were of interpretation, causation and damages, in our opinion, these apply equally to any commercial contract that contains warranties.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from