Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 22 JULY 2026

Less Healthy, More Clarity

Global Advertising Lawyers Alliance (GALA)
Explore more from Global Advertising Lawyers Alliance (GALA)

New ASA rulings clarify when food advertising crosses the line from brand promotion to product-specific marketing under the UK's less healthy food restrictions. Two recent decisions involving McDonald's and Domino's reveal how naming specific menu items can determine whether an advert violates the pre-watershed ban, while a parliamentary committee now questions whether these distinctions should exist at all.

United KingdomConsumer Protection

In January this year, new rules in the CAP and BCAP Codes on advertising “less healthy” food and drink came into force. The headline restriction is straightforward: adverts for an identifiable less healthy product cannot appear on television before 9pm, or as paid-for advertising online at all. What has been much less straightforward, until recently, is working out exactly when a product counts as “identifiable” for these purposes, and when an advert is really just promoting a brand.

Several Advertising Standards Authority rulings have started to fill in that gap. Now two further ASA decisions published today (23 July) add useful data points, one for McDonald's McDelivery and the other for Domino’s Pizza.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from