Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 SEPTEMBER 2024

When To Put A Ring On It? Confidentiality In Litigation Proceedings

Macfarlanes LLP
Macfarlanes LLP
Contributor
Macfarlanes LLP

Macfarlanes LLP

Macfarlanes is a distinctive London-based law firm with a unique combination of services built and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Macfarlanes LLP

The article discusses the use of confidentiality rings in competition and High Court proceedings, highlighting their importance when standard disclosure restrictions are insufficient. Courts emphasize open justice and require specific justifications for confidentiality claims, balancing confidentiality concerns with public interest.

United KingdomAntitrust/Competition Law

The Competition Appeal Tribunal (the CAT) and High Court have been considering the circumstances in which confidentiality rings are appropriate in competition and other proceedings. The key takeaway is that parties should consider whether the additional protection of a confidentiality ring is appropriate in circumstances where the collateral use restrictions in the Civil Procedure Rules (the CPR) or CAT Rules are not sufficient.

The collateral use restrictions (in CPR r. 31.22 and rule 102 of the CAT Rules) require parties to use disclosed documents only for the purpose of the proceedings. When further confidentiality restrictions are required over and above this, a confidentiality ring may be put in place to restrict access to certain documents to a specific subset of people (e.g. external legal representatives and experts).

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from