Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 OCTOBER 2026

Second Bite Of The Apple: CAT Partially Approves Certification Of Failed Riefa Claim

Macfarlanes LLP
Macfarlanes LLP
Contributor
Macfarlanes LLP

Macfarlanes LLP

Macfarlanes is a distinctive London-based law firm with a unique combination of services built and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Macfarlanes LLP

The Competition Appeal Tribunal has partially approved collective proceedings against Apple and Amazon, certifying claims related to on-platform pricing while rejecting off-platform allegations.

United KingdomAntitrust/Competition Law

The Competition Appeal Tribunal has approved part of a collective proceedings originally brought by Professor Riefa against Apple and Amazon, which has now been revived by Mr Le Patourel.

Background 

As we reported in our earlier article, when this claim first came before the Tribunal (the Riefa Claim), the Tribunal refused to grant a collective proceedings order (CPO) on the grounds that the authorisation condition was not met (in particular that the PCR had not “demonstrated sufficient independence or robustness so as to act fairly and adequately in the interests of the class”). At that time, Professor Riefa was the sole director of the SPV which was acting as the proposed class representative (PCR).

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from