Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 OCTOBER 2025

Rowntree v PRS: Unpacking The First Collective Proceedings Strike-out Ruling

Macfarlanes LLP
Macfarlanes LLP
Contributor
Macfarlanes LLP

Macfarlanes LLP

Macfarlanes is a distinctive London-based law firm with a unique combination of services built and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Macfarlanes LLP

As highlighted in our previous update on this case, in August the Competition Appeal Tribunal (the Tribunal) struck out and summarily dismissed Blur drummer David Rowntree's application for a collective proceedings order...

United KingdomAntitrust/Competition Law

As highlighted in our previous update on this case, in August the Competition Appeal Tribunal (the Tribunal) struck out and summarily dismissed Blur drummer David Rowntree's application for a collective proceedings order (CPO) against the Performing Rights Society (PRS). The judgment marks the first time a CPO application has been entirely struck out/summarily dismissed. In this article, we explore the Tribunal's reasons for refusing Mr Rowntree's application.

The claim

PRS is the UK's leading collective management organisation for the performing rights in musical works. It collects and distributes performing right royalties for musical works to its songwriter and publisher members. Such royalties are payable whenever a musical composition is performed or broadcast publicly (master royalties, relating to the recording of a composition, may also be payable).

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from