Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 SEPTEMBER 2021

Market Intelligence Thought Leadership Award Winner

Epic Games v Apple: An $85bn Judgment?

Bristows LLP
Bristows LLP
Contributor
Bristows LLP

Bristows LLP

We are Bristows, the world’s leading specialist law firm for clients that innovate. We are a London...

View firm profile
Explore more from Bristows LLP

We've posted about this dispute several times before (on the initial filing, the UK version, and the EC antitrust complaint). Now, with the California judgment finally out, what's the verdict?

United KingdomAntitrust/Competition Law

We've posted about this dispute several times before (on the initial filing, the UK version, and the EC antitrust complaint). Now, with the California judgment finally out, what's the verdict?

Bloomberg reported that the judgment caused Apple to lose $85bn of its market value. However, that only amounted to a 3.3% drop in share price, and overall, Apple was the clear winner, prevailing on 9 out of 10 issues in dispute. Epic did succeed on one count: the Judge agreed that Apple's "anti-steering" rules banning developers from telling users about alternatives to Apple's in-app purchase system were anti-competitive under California state law. Epic has also appealed the verdict.

A lot of ink has already been spilled summarising the judgment and findings, so I just wanted to pull out a few interesting aspects:

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from