Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 JULY 2025

Brussels vs Big Tech: Unpacking The First DMA Non-compliance Decisions

Macfarlanes LLP
Macfarlanes LLP
Contributor
Macfarlanes LLP

Macfarlanes LLP

Macfarlanes is a distinctive London-based law firm with a unique combination of services built and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Macfarlanes LLP

Following the publication of the first two non-compliance decisions under the Digital Markets Act (DMA), we take a closer look at the reasoning underlying those decisions...

United KingdomAntitrust/Competition Law

Following the publication of the first two non-compliance decisions under the Digital Markets Act (DMA), we take a closer look at the reasoning underlying those decisions, and consider what they tell us about the Commission's approach to enforcement of the regulation.

The Commission's imposition of significant fines on both Apple and Meta – of €500m and €200m respectively – was a landmark moment for the EU's (relatively) new digital markets regulatory regime.

In the face of accusations that US tech companies were being unfairly targeted – prompting speculation that the Commission might opt not to fine either company, the Commission chose to issue fines of comparable severity to those for antitrust violations. This sent out a clear signal that the Commission would not hesitate to use its new fining powers to tackle conduct which it considers breaches the DMA.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from