Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 FEBRUARY 2000

Alternative Dispute Resolution

Macfarlanes LLP
Macfarlanes LLP
Contributor
Macfarlanes LLP

Macfarlanes LLP

Macfarlanes is a distinctive London-based law firm with a unique combination of services built and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Macfarlanes LLP

United KingdomAccounting and Audit

Craig Perry

One of the most important changes resulting from the new civil procedure rules, and one of the most discussed, is the focus that it places on methods of alternative dispute resolution ("ADR"). Under the new rules, the Court now has the power to stay a claim if the parties agree to refer the matter to ADR or if the Court itself thinks that the claim can be dealt with by ADR. The main attraction to litigants is the potential costs saving and the fact that a form of ADR can be chosen to suit a specific type of claim. Since the new rules were introduced, one of the best known ADR bodies (the Centre for Dispute Resolution "CEDR") has recorded a dramatic increase in the use of ADR. CEDR's figures show that the number of cases being referred to ADR has increased by 100% compared to the same period last year, and there is no sign, in the short to medium term, that this dramatic increase is likely to slow down or level off. In comparison, the number of claims issued in the High

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from