Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 SEPTEMBER 2024

The Protection Of Famous Trade Marks

Adams & Adams
Adams & Adams
Contributor
Adams & Adams

Adams & Adams

Who we are: Established in 1908, Adams & Adams is an internationally recognised and leading African...

View firm profile
Explore more from Adams & Adams

In 2004, Benson & Hedges (Overseas) Limited filed an opposition against the registration of trade mark application UG/T/2004/039465 B&H in class 9.

UgandaIntellectual Property

In 2004, Benson & Hedges (Overseas) Limited filed an opposition against the registration of trade mark application UG/T/2004/039465 B&H in class 9. Benson & Hedges based its opposition on the local and international reputation vesting in the BENSON & HEDGES trade marks, including the B&H trade marks. It alleged, in effect, that its trade marks were so well-known in Uganda and abroad that the use of the B&H trade mark in relation goods in class 9 would dilute that reputation. Benson & Hedges relied on article 6bis of the Paris Convention as the basis for its opposition.

Despite being filed in 2004, the Registry heard the matter on an ex parte basis in June 2024. In its ruling, the Registry deals with the issue of delay and was critical of the opponent for failing to prosecute its opposition timeously. Insofar as the protection sought by the opponent, the Registry recognised that while Uganda is a signatory of the Paris Convention, the protection afforded to famous

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from