The Turkish Constitutional Court ruled that the crossover bridge
built near an immovable decreases the immovable's value due to
noise pollution, and therefore violates the owner's right to
property.
The applicant applied to the General Directorate of Highways for
compensation of her loss due to adverse effects incurred by her
immovable as a result of the crossover bridge built near her
immovable. Her application was rejected so she filed a lawsuit
before the administrative court.
The applicant claimed pecuniary compensation with legal interest
starting from the date of application to the administration
alleging that the noise pollution has increased and the view of her
immovable was blocked because of the crossover bridge.