Abstract
Absentee ownership is not, by itself, legally difficult. The risk lies in fragmented authority, weak reporting, missed statutory dates and informal local arrangements. A foreign owner should create a controlled chain of authority, separate the functions of lawyer, manager and bank signatory where appropriate, document every material instruction, and maintain an annual compliance calendar. This article explains the legal framework and the practical controls that make remote ownership manageable.
Introduction
Foreign ownership of real estate in Türkiye does not require the owner to reside in the country. It does, however, require a deliberate legal and operational structure. The central question is not whether the property can be managed remotely, but who may act, for which purpose, with what evidence, and under whose supervision. Turkish law separates ownership, representation, lease administration, tax compliance and condominium governance. Treating them as a single