Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 FEBRUARY 2024

Recognition And Implementation Of Guardianship Decisions Given Abroad In Turkey

Miran Legal
Explore more from Miran Legal

Recognition and enforcement of guardianship decisions made abroad in Turkey takes place within the framework of the International Private and Civil Procedure Law (IPCPL) No. 5718.

TurkeyLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Lara Candoğan
Lara Candoğan
Author LinkedIn connections

Recognition and enforcement of guardianship decisions made abroad in Turkey takes place within the framework of the International Private and Civil Procedure Law (IPCPL) No. 5718. This process aims to ensure the validity and applicability of guardianship decisions that were given abroad in Turkey while ensuring the compliance of the Turkish legal system with international standards.

Law No. 5718 made it possible to recognize and enforce guardianship decisions made abroad in Turkey. Previously, according to the decisions of the Supreme Court, it was thought that there was no possibility of recognizing the restriction decisions that were given in foreign countries in Turkey. However, with the entry into force of the Law No. 5718, it has been concluded that it is possible to recognize and implement these decisions in Turkey by referring to international conventions.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

View source

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

The Competence-Competence Principle

The competence-competence principle grants arbitral tribunals the authority to determine their own jurisdiction, including questions about the validity and scope of arbitration agreements. This article examines how Turkish law implements this fundamental arbitration doctrine through statutory provisions and judicial precedent, analyzing the balance between arbitral autonomy and judicial oversight in both domestic and international arbitration proceedings.
TurkeyLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Kesikli Law Firm
Kesikli Law Firm
Article

Recognition And Enforcement Of Foreign Judgments In Turkey 2026

This article examines the recognition and enforcement of foreign court judgments in Turkey. It considers finality, reciprocity, jurisdiction, public policy, service, documentary requirements, security and the relationship between enforcement permission and actual collection. The discussion distinguishes foreign judgments from arbitral awards and from decisions eligible for a separate administrative registration route.
TurkeyLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
ONGUR & PARTNERS
ONGUR & PARTNERS
Article

Dispute Resolution In Türkiye 2026

This article examines litigation, arbitration and mediation as distinct but connected methods of resolving cross-border disputes involving Türkiye. It considers jurisdiction, service, security for foreign claimants, arbitral consent, institutional procedures, mandatory mediation and the enforcement of outcomes. The statutory and treaty framework is read alongside the judicial authorities cited in the manuscript.
TurkeyLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
ONGUR & PARTNERS
ONGUR & PARTNERS
Article

Inheritance Fraud Lawsuits: Legal Nature, Requirements, And Litigation Process

Inheritance fraud (muris muvazaası) is one of the most common inheritance-related disputes in Turkish legal practice. It typically arises when a deceased person (the decedent) transfers real property to one heir by disguising what is, in reality, a gratuitous transfer (gift) as a sale or a contract of maintenance until death, with the intention of depriving the remaining heirs of their inheritance rights. Although such transactions appear legally valid on their face, they do not reflect the parties' true intentions and are therefore evaluated under the legal principles governing sham transactions (muvazaa).
TurkeyLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Sakar Law Office
Sakar Law Office