Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 OCTOBER 2026

Tahkimde Karar Verme Yetkisinin Yapay Zekâya Devri

Kabine Law
Kabine Law
Contributor
Kabine Law

Kabine Law

We strive to provide our clients with the best possible representation for their most challenging...

View firm profile
Explore more from Kabine Law

Yapay zekâ araçlarının tahkim yargılamalarında kullanımı, hakemlerin karar verme yetkisini devretmesi yasağı bağlamında önemli hukuki soruları gündeme getirmektedir. Esnek ve bağlayıcı hukuk kuralları çerçevesinde bu yasağın kapsamı ve uygulamadaki sonuçları, özellikle Kanada'daki ARIHQ v. Santé Québec kararı ışığında incelenmektedir.

TurkeyLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Göksu Hakan Öztürkeri
Göksu Hakan Öztürkeri

I. Giriş

Yapay zekâ araçları, günlük işlere harcanan zamanı azaltarak ve bu işlerdeki verimliliği artırarak hukukçuların çalışma şeklini önemli ölçüde değiştirmiştir. Çalışma şeklindeki bu dönüşüm tahkim alanında da karşılığını bulmuş olup yapay zekâ artık hakem heyetlerine, yargılama için takvimin hesaplanması, hukuki araştırmaların yürütülmesi ve karmaşık dava dosyalarının özetlenmesi gibi görevlerde yardımcı olmaktadır. Hatta yapay zekânın bizzat hakemlerin rolünü üstlenecek bir aday olması dahi tartışılmaya başlanmıştır.1

Bununla birlikte, hakemler tarafından yapay zekânın kullanımı ciddi soruları ve riskleri beraberinde getirmiştir. Bunlardan en önemlisi, hakemlerin kişisel yetki alanını ihlal edecek şekilde karar verme yetkisini yapay zekâ araçlarına devretmesidir. Bu mesele aslında yeni değildir. Hakem sekreterlerinin, hakem kararının yazım sürecindeki aktif rolünün atanan hakemlerin şahsi değerlendirmesi yerine geçip geçmediği ve tarafların uyuşmazlığı çözecek hakemleri

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

View source

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

The Competence-Competence Principle

The competence-competence principle grants arbitral tribunals the authority to determine their own jurisdiction, including questions about the validity and scope of arbitration agreements. This article examines how Turkish law implements this fundamental arbitration doctrine through statutory provisions and judicial precedent, analyzing the balance between arbitral autonomy and judicial oversight in both domestic and international arbitration proceedings.
TurkeyLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Kesikli Law Firm
Kesikli Law Firm
Article

Recognition And Enforcement Of Foreign Judgments In Turkey 2026

This article examines the recognition and enforcement of foreign court judgments in Turkey. It considers finality, reciprocity, jurisdiction, public policy, service, documentary requirements, security and the relationship between enforcement permission and actual collection. The discussion distinguishes foreign judgments from arbitral awards and from decisions eligible for a separate administrative registration route.
TurkeyLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
ONGUR & PARTNERS
ONGUR & PARTNERS
Article

Dispute Resolution In Türkiye 2026

This article examines litigation, arbitration and mediation as distinct but connected methods of resolving cross-border disputes involving Türkiye. It considers jurisdiction, service, security for foreign claimants, arbitral consent, institutional procedures, mandatory mediation and the enforcement of outcomes. The statutory and treaty framework is read alongside the judicial authorities cited in the manuscript.
TurkeyLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
ONGUR & PARTNERS
ONGUR & PARTNERS
Article

Inheritance Fraud Lawsuits: Legal Nature, Requirements, And Litigation Process

Inheritance fraud (muris muvazaası) is one of the most common inheritance-related disputes in Turkish legal practice. It typically arises when a deceased person (the decedent) transfers real property to one heir by disguising what is, in reality, a gratuitous transfer (gift) as a sale or a contract of maintenance until death, with the intention of depriving the remaining heirs of their inheritance rights. Although such transactions appear legally valid on their face, they do not reflect the parties' true intentions and are therefore evaluated under the legal principles governing sham transactions (muvazaa).
TurkeyLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Sakar Law Office
Sakar Law Office
Article

Recognition And Enforcement Of Foreign Arbitral Awards In Türkiye 2026

This article examines the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in Türkiye and distinguishes those proceedings from subsequent collection. It considers the treaty and statutory framework, public policy, the binding effect of the award, service, documentary requirements, security, interim protection and appeals. The judicial authorities discussed in the text illustrate the limited nature of enforcement review and the importance of a properly prepared record.
TurkeyLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
ONGUR & PARTNERS
ONGUR & PARTNERS
Article

2026 Yılında Kişisel Verilerin Korunması Hakkında Önemli Gelişmeler

Turkey's Personal Data Protection Law marks its tenth anniversary in April 2026, with accelerated efforts toward GDPR alignment. The first half of 2026 witnessed significant developments including new Board decisions on biometric data processing, loyalty card usage, and security camera systems, alongside Constitutional Court rulings on administrative sanctions and the approval of Turkey's first Binding Corporate Rules.
TurkeyPrivacy
Kabine Law
Kabine Law
Article

Important Developments Regarding The Protection Of Personal Data In 2026

Turkey's Personal Data Protection Law marked its tenth anniversary in April 2026, with accelerating efforts toward GDPR harmonization. The first half of 2026 brought significant regulatory developments including principle decisions on biometric data processing, loyalty card verification, and security camera usage, alongside guidance on artificial intelligence tools and a landmark Constitutional Court ruling on administrative penalties.
TurkeyPrivacy
Kabine Law
Kabine Law
Article

Arbitral Awards As Protected Possessions: The ECtHR’s Evolving Approach To Enforcement Under Article 1 Of Protocol No. 1 (Protection Of Property)

The European Court of Human Rights has progressively expanded protection for arbitral awards under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the ECHR, treating them as protected possessions. Through landmark cases spanning three decades, the Court has established that states cannot arbitrarily interfere with final arbitral awards through legislative action, prolonged non-enforcement, or unjustified judicial refusals to enforce.
European UnionLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Kabine Law
Kabine Law