Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 OCTOBER 2022

Why Compulsory Licensing Is A Blunt Instrument In The Post-Covid Landscape

Gün + Partners
Gün + Partners
Contributor
Gün + Partners

Gün + Partners

We are one of the oldest and largest law firms in Turkey and are considered internationally to be...

View firm profile
Explore more from Gün + Partners

Earlier this year the Turkish minister of health announced that President Recep Tayyip Erdogan had made a compulsory licence decision about the active ingredient molnupiravir.

TurkeyIntellectual Property

Earlier this year the Turkish minister of health announced that President Recep Tayyip Erdogan had made a compulsory licence decision about the active ingredient molnupiravir. In line with the fact that the decision was made directly by the president, it was understood that the provision of a compulsory licence due to public interest was applied. However, the patent owner was not notified of the presidential decision nor was it publicly accessible, so the terms, the licensee, the royalty fee and the scope of the decision remained unclear. Crucially, the patent owner himself was not given the opportunity to satisfy public need for molnupiravir under the conditions of the licence.

This is a harsh example of compulsory licensing provisions being used unfairly due to gaps and uncertainties in national law.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from