Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 OCTOBER 2024

Revival Of The Threshold Discussions With The Illumina Grail Case

NAZALI Attorney Partnership
NAZALI Attorney Partnership
Contributor
NAZALI Attorney Partnership

NAZALI Attorney Partnership

NAZALI offers a broad range of legal services in the fields of Corporate and Commercial Law,...

View firm profile
Explore more from NAZALI Attorney Partnership

The European Court of Justice annulled the European Commission's rejection decision on US based Illumina Inc. ("Illumina") and US based Grail L.L.C ("Grail")...

TurkeyAntitrust/Competition Law

The European Court of Justice annulled the European Commission's rejection decision on US based Illumina Inc. ("Illumina") and US based Grail L.L.C ("Grail") based on Article 22 of the EU Merger Regulation1 ("EUMR") on the grounds that the transaction in question did not meet the national merger thresholds. This decision of the Court revitalised the debate on the threshold system in terms of notification of killer acquisitions in merger and acquisition transactions. Türkiye, on the other hand, introduced a different merger threshold system in 2022. In this context, this article will first provide background on the Illumina Grail case. Then, the arguments in the Court's judgement will be discussed. Finally, the threshold systems in EU Member States and the new threshold system for technology undertakings in Türkiye will be mentioned.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from