Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 NOVEMBER 2024

Market Intelligence Thought Leadership Award Winner

AI Hallucinations In Legal Practice: Risks, Real Cases, And Solutions

Logan & Partners
Explore more from Logan & Partners

Generative AI has rapidly entered the legal industry, offering tools for document drafting, legal research and case analysis.

SwitzerlandTechnology
Kiara Brunel Fink
Kiara Brunel Fink
Author LinkedIn connections

Generative AI has rapidly entered the legal industry, offering tools for document drafting, legal research and case analysis. While these tools promise increased efficiency, they also present significant risks – one of which is AI hallucinations. These occur when AI generates content that appears plausible but is entirely inaccurate. In the legal world, using such inaccurate information can lead to serious problems, including presenting false facts or misinterpreting cases and legal precedents.

What are AI hallucinations?

AI hallucinations stem from the pattern-matching processes of generative AI tools, which predict words or phrases based on their training data. Since these models cannot independently verify the accuracy of their outputs, they may provide incorrect or fictitious legal information.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

View source

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

When AI Agents Pay: The Legal Challenges Of Agentic Payments In Switzerland

AI agents no longer merely recommend purchases — they are beginning to select merchants, conclude transactions and pay, within mandates their users define in advance. For Swiss banks and fintechs, this shifts the legal question from whether an institution may deploy an autonomous agent to whether a customer can validly authorise today a payment whose amount, counterparty and timing will only be determined tomorrow. The payment mandate, not the individual payment instruction, becomes the decisive legal control point.
SwitzerlandTechnology
RUGGLE Partner
RUGGLE Partner
Article

Control, Responsibility And Governance Of Autonomous AI Agents In Swiss Fintech

As autonomous AI agents increasingly perform decision-making functions within financial institutions, Swiss fintechs must confront fundamental questions of control, accountability and governance. Existing regulatory obligations remain fully applicable: autonomy in the machine does not displace responsibility in the firm. The task is to build oversight frameworks that keep pace with technological independence rather than yield to it.
SwitzerlandTechnology
RUGGLE Partner
RUGGLE Partner