Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 MAY 2015

Switzerland's Practice Of Information Exchange Regarding Stolen Data

MLL Meyerlustenberger Lachenal Froriep Ltd
Explore more from MLL Meyerlustenberger Lachenal Froriep Ltd

The legal position taken by the FTA is not universally shared across the Swiss doctrine on the use of evidence gathered with the assistance of illegally obtained information.

SwitzerlandTax
MLL Meyerlustenberger Lachenal Froriep Ltd
MLL Meyerlustenberger Lachenal Froriep Ltd

Introduction

The Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes (Global Forum) decided in mid-March 2015 that Switzerland should enter Phase 2 of the Peer Review. This decision represents a clear statement by the OECD that Switzerland's legal and regulatory framework for information exchange complies with internationally agreed standards reflected in Art. 26 of the OECD Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital (OECD-MA).

Switzerland is now eligible for Phase 2 of the Peer Review examining the practical implementation of that framework. The only member state of the Global Forum that withheld its consent to Switzerland's entry into Phase 2 was India, which accuses Switzerland of refusing to cooperate in relation to the approximately 400 requests for information exchange recently submitted by India. Switzerland takes the position that these requests are based on stolen data (essentially stemming from a CD that is said to have originated

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from