Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 MARCH 2024

Market Intelligence Thought Leadership Award Winner

2024 IBA Guidelines On Conflicts Of Interest In International Arbitration

Aceris Law
Aceris Law
Contributor
Aceris Law

Aceris Law

Aceris Law is a leading boutique international arbitration law firm. It provides the...

View firm profile
Explore more from Aceris Law

In February 2024, the International Bar Association (the "IBA") released the most recent version of the IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration (the "2024 IBA Guidelines").

SwitzerlandLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Aceris Law
Aceris Law
Author LinkedIn connections

In February 2024, the International Bar Association (the "IBA") released the most recent version of the IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration (the "2024 IBA Guidelines"). The new 2024 IBA Guidelines introduce several notable updates to the previous 2014 version of the Guidelines.1

Conflicts of interest are important. An undisclosed conflict of interest may result in the annulment of an arbitration award or an arbitration award that is unenforceable. The IBA Guidelines represent a comprehensive soft law instrument, defining a framework to ensure the impartiality and independence of the arbitrators in international arbitrations. The most recent 2024 version of the IBA Guidelines aims to strengthen further and emphasize the importance of general standards regarding impartiality, independence, and disclosure in international arbitration.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

View source

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

Can Arbitrators Ask Artificial Intelligence For Its View On Legal Issues?

Artificial intelligence is increasingly being used in international arbitration for legal research, document review, and drafting. However, its use becomes difficult to assess when an arbitrator turns to AI not merely to process information, but to obtain a view on a legal issue that the tribunal must decide. This article examines emerging guidance on whether arbitrators can ask AI for its opinion on legal questions and explores the boundaries between AI as a research tool and AI as a decision-maker.
SwitzerlandLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Aceris Law
Aceris Law
Article

New 2026 ICC Arbitration Rules

The International Chamber of Commerce has approved a revised version of its Rules of Arbitration, set to take effect on 1 June 2026, introducing significant procedural changes designed to enhance efficiency and responsiveness to global user needs. Key modifications include a new highly expedited procedure enabling final awards within three months, removal of mandatory Terms of Reference, and increased flexibility in time limits for arbitral awards.
SwitzerlandLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Aceris Law
Aceris Law
Article

Piercing The Corporate Veil In Swiss Enforcement Proceedings

Swiss law generally maintains a strict separation between a company's assets and those of its shareholders, but courts may exceptionally disregard this principle when it constitutes an abuse of rights. This analysis explores the legal framework and practical requirements for both piercing and reverse piercing the corporate veil in Switzerland, with particular emphasis on how these doctrines apply in debt enforcement and attachment proceedings.
SwitzerlandLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Loyens & Loeff
Loyens & Loeff
Article

Behind The Curtain: A Step-by-Step Guide To SIAC Arbitration Under The 2025 Rules

The 2025 SIAC Arbitration Rules introduce significant procedural innovations including Streamlined and Expedited Procedures, Preliminary Determination mechanisms, and enhanced Emergency Arbitrator frameworks. Understanding how these rules operate in practice—from initial filing through tribunal constitution, evidence presentation, and final award—is essential for parties navigating SIAC arbitration effectively.
SingaporeLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Aceris Law
Aceris Law
Article

Hong Kong Sets Aside USD 481.6 Million Award: The Duty To Address The Defence Actually Advanced

The Hong Kong Court of First Instance set aside a USD 481.6 million arbitral award after finding that the tribunal failed to address the actual estoppel defence presented by the respondents. The court distinguished between a tribunal rejecting arguments on their merits versus failing to determine the essential issue actually advanced, emphasizing that tribunals must address the specific case presented rather than a materially different question.
Hong KongLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Aceris Law
Aceris Law
Article

A FRANDly Forum? The Growing Role Of Arbitration In SEP Disputes

Standard-essential patent disputes reveal a fundamental tension between territorial patent rights and global technology markets. While patents are enforced nationally, the standards they protect operate across borders, triggering parallel proceedings in multiple jurisdictions. FRAND arbitration offers a potentially coherent alternative by allowing parties to place international SEP portfolios before a single specialist tribunal, though questions of consent, validity, competition law and enforceability compl
United KingdomIntellectual Property
Aceris Law
Aceris Law
Article

Can Arbitrators Ask Artificial Intelligence For Its View On Legal Issues?

Artificial intelligence is increasingly being used in international arbitration for legal research, document review, and drafting. However, its use becomes difficult to assess when an arbitrator turns to AI not merely to process information, but to obtain a view on a legal issue that the tribunal must decide. This article examines emerging guidance on whether arbitrators can ask AI for its opinion on legal questions and explores the boundaries between AI as a research tool and AI as a decision-maker.
SwitzerlandLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Aceris Law
Aceris Law
Article

Banesco v. Panama: ICSID Jurisdiction, Foreign-Controlled Companies And Regulatory Ambiguity

An ICSID tribunal examined whether a Spanish holding company's locally incorporated Panamanian subsidiary could invoke treaty protection over disputed surety bonds in public procurement. The case turned on the distinction between protecting an investment and conferring standing on a foreign-controlled local entity, while also addressing whether regulatory ambiguity and administrative delays breached fair and equitable treatment standards.
GlobalLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Aceris Law
Aceris Law