Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 FEBRUARY 2017

Korean Ruling Places Qualcomm's Business Model At Risk

Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Contributor
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

Mintz is a litigation powerhouse and business accelerator serving leaders in life sciences, private...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

On December 28, 2016, the Korean Fair Trade Commission issued a steep fine against Qualcomm for antitrust violations in patent licensing and modem chip sales – a record penalty that the U.S. company will challenge in court.

South KoreaIntellectual Property
Michael Renaud
Michael Renaud
Robert Kidwell
Robert Kidwell
Robert J.L. Moore
Robert J.L. Moore
Farrah Short
Farrah Short
Author LinkedIn connections

On December 28, 2016, the Korean Fair Trade Commission (KFTC) issued a steep fine ("KFTC Ruling") against Qualcomm for antitrust violations in patent licensing and modem chip sales – a record penalty that the U.S. company will challenge in court. Finding that Qualcomm leverages its standard-essential patent (SEP) portfolio to further its chipset business in contravention of Qualcomm's fair, reasonable and nondiscriminatory (FRAND) obligations and Korean antitrust law, the agency levied a penalty of over US$850 million and directed Qualcomm to alter its business model.

The KFTC Ruling is just one of the latest challenges to Qualcomm's licensing strategy and also sets forth Korea's understanding of what FRAND obligations entail. Mintz Levin attorneys provide detail and insight in " Korea, In Sanctioning Qualcomm, Articulates A New Meaning For 'FRAND'", as published on IP Law 360.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from