Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 NOVEMBER 2016

Trade Marks That Offend

Two US trade mark cases have dominated the headlines, and one of these has made it all the way to the US Supreme Court.

South AfricaIntellectual Property

Offensive trade marks, which we have written about previously, have again been in the news of late. Two US trade mark cases have dominated the headlines, and one of these has made it all the way to the US Supreme Court. This certainly suggests that Americans feel strongly about the issue of offensive trade marks. As South Africans are likely to have equally strong feelings on the issue of names that might offend particular groups, these US cases are worth discussing.

The first case is one we have written about before, the case of the US football team the Washington Redskins. The team's trade mark registrations for its name were cancelled on the basis that they contravene the section of the US trade mark legislation (the Lanham Act) that deals with offensive or disparaging trade marks. This decision to cancel the registrations was upheld by the US Trademark Trial and Appeal Board on the basis that the trade marks contain "matter that is likely to disparage".

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from