Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 DECEMBER 2012

Africa: Naming Without Shaming

In a recent article, which appeared in the September 2012 issue of the Harvard Law Review, it was emphasised that companies doing business in China should take a great deal of care when choosing brand names.

South AfricaIntellectual Property

In a recent article, which appeared in the September 2012 issue of the Harvard Law Review, it was emphasised that companies doing business in China should take a great deal of care when choosing brand names. The peculiar challenges faced by China include transliterations, the fact that the language consists of thousands of characters, and the fact that there are significant regional differences.

In considering these challenges, the article focussed on two examples of bad brand name choices faced by companies recently. First, there was  Clairol's decision  to call a deodorant Mist Stick which was not welcomed by the Germans as 'mist' means 'manure' in German. The problem faced by Clairol, in this instance, was the public's reluctance to purchase a deodorant alluding to a bad smell. Second, there was Mazda's decision to call a mini-van Laputa, which offended the people of Chile since 'puta' means 'prostitute' in Spanish.   Car manufacturers such as GM also faced

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from