Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 JUNE 2012

Mining And Energy E-Alert - June 2012

Webber Wentzel
Webber Wentzel
Contributor
Webber Wentzel

Webber Wentzel

Founded in 1868, Webber Wentzel is a leading full-service law firm that provides clients with...

View firm profile
Explore more from Webber Wentzel

In a far-reaching and unanimous judgment delivered on Thursday 31 May 2012, in Minister of Minerals and Energy v Agri South Africa [2012] ZASCA 93, the Supreme Court of Appeal ("the Court") held that the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act, 2002 ("the MPRDA") did not bring about a general expropriation of mineral rights in South Africa.

South AfricaEnergy and Natural Resources
Peter Leon
Peter Leon
Kelly-Anne Ramages-Jones
Kelly-Anne Ramages-Jones
Jeanette Russell
Jeanette Russell
Avani Singh
Avani Singh
Jonathan Veeran
Jonathan Veeran
Ben Winks
Ben Winks

BREAKING NEWS: SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL FINDS THAT THE MPRDA DID NOT BRING ABOUT AN EXPROPRIATION OF OLD ORDER MINERAL RIGHTS.

In a far-reaching and unanimous judgment delivered on Thursday 31 May 2012, in Minister of Minerals and Energy v Agri South Africa [2012] ZASCA 93, the Supreme Court of Appeal ("the Court") held that the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act, 2002 ("the MPRDA") did not bring about a general expropriation of mineral rights in South Africa. In doing so, the Court upheld an appeal by the Minister of Minerals and Energy ("the Minister") and rejected the reasoning of the North Gauteng High Court that the MPRDA had extinguished all unused old order rights existing under the previous minerals regime and vested the substance of those rights in the state, thus expropriating them and requiring compensation under section 25(2) of the Constitution.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from