Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 MARCH 2012

Berts Bricks Implications

The recent unreported decision of the North Gauteng High Court in Bert’s Bricks (Pty) Ltd and Another v the Inspector of Mines, North West Region and Others has important implications for mining companies and companies which process minerals.

South AfricaEnergy and Natural Resources
Andrew Mitchell
Andrew Mitchell
Paul Fouche
Paul Fouche
Matthew Van Der Want
Matthew Van Der Want

The recent unreported decision of the North Gauteng High Court in Bert's Bricks (Pty) Ltd and Another v the Inspector of Mines, North West Region and Others has important implications for mining companies and companies which process minerals. The case examined whether production facilities situated close to and on the same farm as a mining operation are governed by the Mine Health and Safety Act, 1996 ("MHSA").

Although the case focused on mine health and safety issues, and even though the State respondents did not place any evidence before the court, the court's reasoning has important consequences for what constitutes a "mining area" for purposes of the MHSA and the MPRDA, and specifically part (ii) of the definition of "mining area" which relates to "any environmental, health or social and labour matter".

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from