Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 MAY 2005

Could Public Interest Trump Competition Issues in a Merger?

Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr
Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr
Contributor
Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr

Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr

Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr (CDH) is one of the largest full-service business law firms in South Africa,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr

Section 12 A of the Competition Act 89 of 1998 suggests that a merger, which on the face of it is anti-competitive, can be justified on the basis of substantial public interest benefits and an otherwise pro-competitive merger can be prohibited on substantial public interest grounds.

South AfricaAntitrust/Competition Law
David Thompson
David Thompson
Sasha Daniels
Sasha Daniels

Section 12 A of the Competition Act 89 of 1998 suggests that a merger, which on the face of it is anti-competitive, can be justified on the basis of substantial public interest benefits and an otherwise pro-competitive merger can be prohibited on substantial public interest grounds.

The Competition Tribunal considers mergers in a number of stages. First, it considers whether the merger will substantially prevent or lessen competition. If it will, the Tribunal must determine if the anti-competitive effects are offset by any technological, efficiency or other pro-competitive gains. Whatever the conclusion, the Tribunal must consider the effect that the merger will have on:

  • a particular industrial sector or region;

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from