Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 NOVEMBER 2015

Singapore High Court Refuses Post-grant Patent Amendments

Marks & Clerk
Marks & Clerk
Contributor
Marks & Clerk

Marks & Clerk

Marks & Clerk LLP was founded in 1887 by George Croydon Marks, who was joined in partnership by...

View firm profile
Explore more from Marks & Clerk

Ship's Equipment Centre Bremen (SEC) is the owner of two Singapore patents relating to a coupling device used to secure shipping containers, commonly known as a twistlock.

SingaporeIntellectual Property

In a recent case, Ship’s Equipment Centre Bremen v Fuji Trading (Singapore) and others [2015] SGHC 159, the Singapore High Court departed from its “lenient approach” advocated by earlier decisions and rejected an application by the patentee for leave to amend a patent post-grant.

Ship’s Equipment Centre Bremen (SEC) is the owner of two Singapore patents relating to a coupling device used to secure shipping containers, commonly known as a twistlock. In 2010 and 2011, SEC initiated proceedings to sue a number of Singapore and Japanese companies (Defendants) for alleged infringement. The Defendants denied infringement and challenged the validity of the Singapore patents. 

While the infringement proceedings were still ongoing, in late 2012, SEC applied to the Singapore High Court to request leave to amend the claims of one of the patents.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from