Legal 500
Log in or register
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR

© 2026 Legalease Ltd. All rights reserved

Registered company in England & Wales No. 02427356 VAT GB 321 5727 22

Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG

  • Legal 500 Trust Centre
  • Contact Us
  • home
  • Market Intelligence
  • Search

Your search for ‘Spruson & Ferguson’ returned 1,285 results

Use advanced search filters to refine your search

Advanced search filters

Topics
Countries
Contributor

Start typing to add contributors

Content type
Show options
  • Article

    IP Australia Updates Computer-implemented Invention Guidance Following Aristocrat ’25

    IP Australia has updated its Patent Manual following the High Court's decision in Aristocrat Technologies, providing clearer guidance on patentability of computer-implemented inventions. While the changes don't broadly expand patentability for software inventions, they establish a more structured framework for applicants to challenge narrow claim characterizations during examination, particularly in sectors like fintech, AI, and digital services.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Is New Zealand's New Patents Legislation About to Get a 'Shot in the Arm'?

    Recent developments relating to a "Building Innovation" Report suggest that NZ is coming closer to a new patents regime.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Out on a limb: Australian examination guidelines for patentability at odds with best global practice and Australian law

    The updated APO guidelines for patentability are also arguably counterproductive to encouraging innovation in Australia.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Patents: Current snapshot of the licensing of SEPs in Australia

    Article provides a snapshot of the licensing of SEPs in Australia & provides a description of a standard essential patent.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    (Pods) Under pressure: Cantarella Bros Pty Ltd v Koninklijke Douwe Egberts B.V. [2018] APO 15

    A withdrawn patent application can still form part of the prior art base in certain circumstances.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Recent changes to New Zealand trade mark law

    Summary of the recent changes to NZ Trade Mark law.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Rolling Stones block trade mark registration of Australian fashion label

    Rock and roll icons, Rolling Stones prevented trade mark registration of the Australian fashion label, JAGGER & STONE.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Routine omnibus claims in patent applications – not routine anymore in the UK

    These changes are intended to simplify, clarify and bring greater certainty to users of the UK patent system.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Say it isn't so: Incorporations by reference and priority claims

    The disclosure of all parent applications should be included in any subsequent divisional application to ensure priority.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Say it isn't so: Incorporations by reference and priority claims

    The disclosure in parent and priority applications should be included in any subsequent applications to claim priority.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Software patents in Australia: challenging times ahead

    The Court introduced new and unexpected requirements for patentability of inventions in the information technology space.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Specification Key To Unlocking Prior Art Admissions

    The Full Court of the Federal Court has dismissed an appeal by Lockwood Security Products Pty Ltd (Lockwood) and has held that several claims in Lockwood’s Australian Patent No. 702534 (the Patent) were invalid for being obvious. In addition, the Full Court also held that Doric Products Pty Ltd (Doric) did not infringe those claims that covered the preferred embodiment of the invention described in the Patent.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    The claws come out – a distinctive design - or trade mark infringement?

    The case shows a design element can change the impression conveyed, so the composite mark gave a different impression.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Trade mark dispute: Rolex SA v LG Display Co Ltd [2020] ATMO 136 (13 August 2020)

    When adopting a new trade mark, applicants must consider if that mark could be found similar to another existing mark.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Trade marks in the metaverse

    The metaverse is said to be a new version of the internet, so consider trademark registration as for virtual assets.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Victoria Beckham fails to protect her VB trade mark

    Victoria Beckham should have registered her VB trade mark as soon as she commenced using that trade mark in Australia.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    The CPTPP has been signed – no United States and IP Lite

    The CPTPP isn't missing only the US – the TPP text has been stripped of several "polarising" clauses, including IP.
    AustraliaInternational Law
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    New Australian mandatory data breach law introduced to Parliament: more changes to privacy law

    Mandatory data breach law adds to the privacy law businesses must comply withh.
    AustraliaPrivacy
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    China update: eagerly awaited new patent law amendment draft now available for discussion

    Summary of key points from the amendments to patent laws in China.
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Malaysian Trade Marks Update – Trademarks Bill 2019

    The article includes key changes introduced in Trademarks Bill 2019, which proposes to replace the Trade Marks Act 1976.
    MalaysiaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Showing 741–760 of 1285 results

    PreviousNext
    Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics