Legal 500
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • News & Developments
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • News & Developments
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR

© 2026 Legalease Ltd. All rights reserved

Registered company in England & Wales No. 02427356 VAT GB 321 5727 22

Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG

  • Data Protection policies
  • Cookies Policy
  • Supplier Code of Conduct
  • Modern Slavery and Human Trafficking Statement
  • Contact Us
  • home
  • Market Intelligence
  • Search

Your search for ‘Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.’ returned 1,717 results

Use advanced search filters to refine your search

Advanced search filters

Topics
Countries
Contributor

Start typing to add contributors

Content type
Show options
  • Article

    TTABlog Test: How Did These Three Failure-to-Function Appeals Turn Out?

    It seems that failure-to-function refusals are increasing in frequency. Just in the last few days,the Board issued decisions in three such cases.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
  • Article

    TTABlog Test: How Did These Three Section 2(d) Appeals Come Out?

    A TTAB judge once said to me that one can predict the outcome of a Section 2(d) case 95% of the time just by looking at the marks and the goods or services.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
Article

TTABlog Test: Is CHRONICLE For Beer Confusable With CHRONICLE For Restaurant Services?

The USPTO refused to register the mark CHRONICLE for beer, finding a likelihood of confusion with the identical mark registered for restaurant services.
United StatesIntellectual Property
Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
  • Article

    TTABlog Test: Is "ELEPHANT LEARNING MATH ACADAMY" Confusable With "ELEPHANT GAMES" For Computer Game Software?

    The USPTO refused to register the mark ELEPHANT LEARNING MATH ACADEMY for downloadable educational software apps [LEARNING and MATH ACADEMY disclaimed]...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
  • Article

    TTABlog Test: Is GNARLED ORCHARD For Hard Cider Confusable With GNARLY HEAD For Wine?

    Delicato Vineyards opposed this application to register the mark GNARLED ORCHARD for hard cider, claiming a likelihood of confusion with its registered mark GNARLY HEAD for wines.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
  • Article

    TTABlog Test: Is HERITAGE SOUTHEAST BANK Confusable With SOUTHEAST BANK (Stylized), For Banking Services?

    The USPTO refused to register the mark HERITAGE SOUTHEAST BANK [BANK disclaimed], on the ground of likelihood of confusion with the mark SOUTHEAST BANK in the stylized form shown immediately below
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
  • Article

    TTABlog Test: Is "NEW SILK ROAD" Deceptive For Clothing Not Made Of Silk?

    The USPTO refused registration of the mark NEW SILK ROAD for clothing, on the ground that the mark is deceptive under Section 2(a) ...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
  • Article

    TTABlog Test: Is "ONE GREEN" Confusable With "8GREENS" For Nutritional Supplements?

    Tasty Greens LLC opposed an application to register the mark ONE GREEN for nutritional supplements, claiming a likelihood of confusion with its registered mark 8GREENS, also for nutritional supplements.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
  • Article

    TTABlog Test: Is SPIDER WOOD Merely Descriptive Of Natural Wood Sculptures For Aquariums And Terrariums?

    The USPTO refused to register the proposed mark SPIDER WOOD (not to be confused with Tiger Woods or Natalie Wood) for "Decorative ornaments in the nature of natural sculptures...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
  • Article

    TTABlog Test Is "YOU'RE AN IDIOT" For Card Games Confusable With "YOU MUST BE AN IDIOT" For Board Games?

    Each of the parties to this Section 2(d) cancellation proceeding filed a motion for summary judgment.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
  • Article

    VANILLA JAVA PORTER Lacks Acquired Distinctiveness For Beer, Says TTAB

    The Board affirmed a refusal to register the mark VANILLA JAVA PORTER for beer [PORTER disclaimed] on the ground that applicant, who was seeking registration under Section 2(f) of the Trademark Act...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
  • Article

    WYHA? TTAB Finds "5 DAY FASTING DIET" Merely Descriptive Of Nutritionally Balanced Prepared Meals

    L-Nutra insisted that a consumer could not, just by looking at the mark, understand that the goods require a medical consultation.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
  • Article

    WYHA? TTAB Finds "APPLE SUGAR" Merely Descriptive Of Sweeteners Including Fruit Skins

    The Board affirmed a Section 2(e)(1) refusal to register APPLE SUGAR, finding the proposed mark to be merely descriptive of "natural sweetener, sugar substitutes
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
  • Article

    WYHA? TTAB Finds "THE CYRKLE" Confusable With "THE CIRCLE" For Live Musical Services

    Those of a certain age will remember The Cyrkle and their mid 1960s hit songs, "Red Rubber Ball" and "Turn-Down Day."
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
  • Article

    Petitioner Beware: Inconsistent Claim Construction Positions Can Doom A Petition

    While the Board recognizes that its rules do not require petitioners to take "positions consistent with related cases in different for a.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
  • Article

    TTAB Finds American Outdoor Brands Corporation Geographically Descripive, Affirms Refusals In 30 Applications

    In two decisions issued on the same day, the Board found the proposed mark AMERICAN OUTDOOR BRANDS CORPORATION to be primarily geographically descriptive of various goods and services mostly related to firearms.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
  • Article

    TTABlog Test: How Did These Three Recent Section 2(d) Appeals Turn Out?

    So far this year, the Board has affirmed 155 of the 167 Section 2(d) refusals on appeal (just about 93%)
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
  • Article

    TTABlog Test: How Did These Three Recent Section 2(d) Appeals Turn Out?

    So far this year, the Board has affirmed 158 of the 170 Section 2(d) refusals on appeal (just about 93%). Here are three decisions that came down recently. How do you think they came out? [Results in first comment].
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
  • Article

    TTABlog Test: How Did These Three Recent Section 2(d) Appeals Turn Out?

    So far this year, the TTAB has affirmed 162 of the 174 Section 2(d) refusals on appeal (about 93%). Here are three decisions that came down recently. How do you think they came out? [Results in first comment].
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
  • Article

    TTABlog Test: How Did These Three Recent Section 2(d) Appeals Come Out?

    September 30th was the last day of the USPTO fiscal year. Here are three of the five TTAB decisions issued on that day in Section 2(d) appeals.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
    Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
  • Showing 681–700 of 1717 results

    PreviousNext
    Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics