Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 JULY 2017

VANILLA JAVA PORTER Lacks Acquired Distinctiveness For Beer, Says TTAB

Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
Contributor
Wolf Greenfield & Sacks

Wolf Greenfield & Sacks

Wolf, Greenfield is one of the 10 largest law firms in the United States devoted exclusively to...

View firm profile
Explore more from Wolf Greenfield & Sacks

The Board affirmed a refusal to register the mark VANILLA JAVA PORTER for beer [PORTER disclaimed] on the ground that applicant, who was seeking registration under Section 2(f) of the Trademark Act...

United StatesIntellectual Property

The Board affirmed a refusal to register the mark VANILLA JAVA PORTER for beer [PORTER disclaimed] on the ground that applicant, who was seeking registration under Section 2(f) of the Trademark Act, failed to prove acquired distinctiveness. In re Detroit Rivertown Brewing Company, LLC, Serial No. 86640818 (July 10, 2017) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Susan J. Hightower).

Applicant conceded that VANILLA JAVA PORTER is not inherently distinctive by amending its application to seek registration under Section 2(f). Thus the only issue for the Board was the sufficiency of applicant's evidence of acquired distinctiveness.

Applicant submitted an affidavit from its president stating that the mark has been in use for 10 years, the beer has been sold in 20 states and the District of Columbia, sales have exceeded $5 million dollars, advertising expenditures have totaled more than $250,000, the beer has been mentioned in numerous media articles, it is the flagship

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from