Your search for ‘Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.’ returned 1,717 results

A TTAB Administrative Trademark Judge once said to me that one can predict the outcome of a Section 2(d)...

About ten years ago, a TTAB judge said to me that one can predict the outcome of a Section 2(d) case 95% ...

A TTAB judge once said to me that one can predict the outcome of a Section 2(d) case 95% of the time just by looking at the marks and the goods or services.

Here we go again! The Board recently decided the appeals from the three Section 2(d) refusals summarized below. At least one of the refusals was reversed.

In a nonprecedential ruling, the CAFC upheld the Board's decision dismissing an opposition to registration of SKY CINEMAS for "movie theaters" [CINEMAS disclaimed], finding the mark not likely to cause confusion with SKY NEWS for radio and television news services.

In an eight-page opinion, the CAFC upheld the Board's decision (here) affirming a Section 2(d) refusal to register the word+design mark shown below for various clothing items

In a nonprecedential ruling, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit upheld the TTAB's decision of April 4, 2018 [TTABlogged here]

In a non-precedential ruling, the CAFC reversed the Board's decision [here] denying cancellation of registrations for the mark MONEY MART in standard character form for loan financing...

The Board dismissed this petition for cancellation of Roman Atwood's registration for the mark SMILE MORE for various goods (stickers, backpacks, shirts) and for retail store service featuring clothing, denying petitioner's claim that the term fails to function as a mark.

A divided Board panel reversed a Section 2(d) refusal of MINIBAR SMARTSNAX for packaged snack food "for distribution through refrigerators and food storage cabinets

Did you know that you don't need to patent every bright idea that you have in order to make money off it? Some of the most valuable intellectual property is protected as a trade secret.

The Board dismissed this petition for cancellation of a registration for the mark TREE'S WINGS & RIBS, in standard character form, for restaurant services, ruling that petitioner's abandonment-by-naked-licensing claim...

In 2022, by my reckoning, the Board issued final decisions in 51 appeals from Section 2(e)(1) mere descriptiveness refusals or from disclaimer requirements based on descriptiveness.

Patent claims that could be indefinite have long raised tricky issues for parties in IPR. Should petitioners challenge in IPR claims they think are indefinite?

The USPTO refused to register the mark MAKE SHIFT HAPPEN in stylized form (shown first below) for "Hats; Hoodies; Shirts and short-sleeved shirts; T-shirts; Graphic T-shirts,...

The Board upheld a refusal to register the proposed mark MADE FOR YOU LAB-GROWN DIAMONDS, in standard character and design form, for 'diamonds; jewelry" [LAB-GROWN DIAMONDS disclaimed]...

In a brief 10-page opinion, the Board sustained an opposition to the mark PARATI for "alcoholic beverages, except beers; spirits ...

The Board affirmed refusals to register the term ".CAM" in standard character and stylized form on the Supplemental Register for an extensive list of services in International Classes.