Legal 500
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions

    • Submissions

    • Future Lawyers

  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers

    • Barristers’ Sets

    • Networks

    • Interview with…

  • In-House

    • In-House Content

    • GC Powerlist

  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products

    • Legal Business

    • News & Developments

    • About us

      • Legal 500

      • FAQs

      • Marketing

      • Careers

      • Contact us

  • Comparative Guides

  • Events

  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500

  • FAQs

  • Marketing

  • Careers

  • Contact us

  • Deutschland DE

  • Paris FR

  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions

    • Submissions

    • Future Lawyers

  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers

    • Barristers’ Sets

    • Networks

    • Interview with…

  • In-House

    • In-House Content

    • GC Powerlist

  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products

    • Legal Business

    • News & Developments

    • About us

      • Legal 500

      • FAQs

      • Marketing

      • Careers

      • Contact us

  • Comparative Guides

  • Events

  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500

  • FAQs

  • Marketing

  • Careers

  • Contact us

  • Deutschland DE

  • Paris FR

© 2026 Legalease Ltd. All rights reserved

Registered company in England & Wales No. 02427356 VAT GB 321 5727 22

Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG

  • Data Protection policies
  • Cookies Policy
  • Supplier Code of Conduct
  • Modern Slavery and Human Trafficking Statement
  • Contact Us
  • Article

    Standard For Amending Claims In IPR May Need To Change

    The Idle Free decision denied the patent owner’s motion to amend claims on the ground that the patent owner had not proven the tentability of the claims.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Banner & Witcoff
    Banner & Witcoff
  • Article

    Law On Divided Infringement Remains Uncertain

    Direct infringement requires making, using, selling, offering to sell, or importing an invention.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Banner & Witcoff
    Banner & Witcoff
  • Article

    Changes Coming To U.S. Patent Law

    Companies interested in protecting their inventions should be aware of major changes that are coming to U.S. patent law.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Banner & Witcoff
    Banner & Witcoff
  • Article

    The First-To-File Toolbox: Intake, Checklists, Templates

    Under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, the United States has moved from a first-to-invent regime to a first-inventor-to-file regime.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Banner & Witcoff
    Banner & Witcoff
  • Article

    The Written Description Requirement In US Design Patent Prosecution: Background And Recent Developments

    On February 6, 2014, the United States Patent and Trademark Office announced a roundtable to solicit public opinions regarding the written description requirement as applied to US design patent applications in "rare" situations.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Banner & Witcoff
    Banner & Witcoff
  • Article

    U.S. Implementation Of The Hague Agreement – What You Need To Know

    On Dec. 18, 2012, U.S. President Barack Obama signed the Patent Law Treaties Implementation Act of 2012 into law.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Banner & Witcoff
    Banner & Witcoff
  • Article

    U.S. Supreme Court Rules In ABC v. Aereo

    Yesterday, the U.S. Supreme Court decided American Broadcasting Companies, et al. v. Aereo.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Banner & Witcoff
    Banner & Witcoff
  • Article

    Industrial Strength

    US President Barack Obama enacted the Patent Law Treaties Implementation Act of 2012, and the Hague Agreement Implementation section of the act adds new design provisions to the patent provisions of Title 35 of the US Code.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Banner & Witcoff
    Banner & Witcoff
  • Article

    A Hague Accolade: The United States Is Poised To Join An International Design Protection System

    The United States is preparing to enact the legislation needed to implement the Hague System for the International Registration of Industrial Designs, which provides a simplified application process for obtaining design protection in jurisdictions that have become contracting parties to the Hague Agreement.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Banner & Witcoff
    Banner & Witcoff
  • Article

    The America Invents Act And What It Means For The Future Of Patent Acquisition And Enforcement

    On September 8, 2011, the United States Senate approved the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (H.R. 1249), finalizing congressional acceptance of long-anticipated U.S. patent reform.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Banner & Witcoff
    Banner & Witcoff
  • Article

    IP Decisions Abound At The Supreme Court In Spring 2014

    After leaving the realm of intellectual property law alone for decades, the United States Supreme Court has strongly reestablished its presence.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Banner & Witcoff
    Banner & Witcoff
  • Article

    The Anticipated US Ascension To Hague Agreement

    The United States is on the cusp of enacting legislation that will likely lead to U.S. ascension to the Hague Agreement Concerning the International Registration of Industrial Designs.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Banner & Witcoff
    Banner & Witcoff
  • Article

    Tools To Protect Your Rights And Brands During gTLD Evaluations

    gTLD applicants and/or trademark or brand owners will have a busy year as the gTLD evaluation process continues to unfold and ICANN, the Internet governing body started overseeing the new gTLD process.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Banner & Witcoff
    Banner & Witcoff
  • Article

    Patent Developments For IT Practitioners

    CLS Bank International v. Alice Corp. PTY. Ltd., 717 F.3d 1269 (Fed. Cir. 2013), superseding 685 F.3d 1341 (Fed. Cir. 2012). Alice Corp. is the owner of four patents that cover a computerized trading platform for exchanging obligations in which a trusted third party settles obligations between a first and second party to eliminate settlement risk, which is the risk that only one party’s obligation will be paid
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Banner & Witcoff
    Banner & Witcoff
  • Article

    Streamlining Patent Litigation Through Non-Statutory Tools

    Fueled by high financial stakes and the specter of injunctions, patent litigation is incredibly complex, expensive and can involve protracted battles at every step of the process.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Banner & Witcoff
    Banner & Witcoff
  • Article

    The Biosimilars Act: The United States’ Entry Into Regulating Biosimilars And Its Implications

    On March 23, 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act was officially signed into law, which included provisions that greatly altered the delivery of healthcare services in the United States.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Banner & Witcoff
    Banner & Witcoff
  • Article

    Developments In Patent Law 2013: Court Decisions December 2012 To December 2013

    Alice Corp. is the owner of four patents that cover a computerized trading platform for exchanging obligations in which a trusted third party settles obligations between a first and second party to eliminate settlement risk, which is the risk that only one party’s obligation will be paid.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Banner & Witcoff
    Banner & Witcoff
  • Article

    Design Patent Functionality After Egyptian Goddess And Richardson: The Assumption Of Claim Construction Dysfunction And Gumption

    The Federal Circuit’s decisions in Egyptian Goddess v. Swisa and Richardson v. Stanley Works have afforded district courts considerable discretion regarding how to assess functional features of claimed designs in the context of infringement.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Banner & Witcoff
    Banner & Witcoff
  • Article

    Black IP Lawyers Who've Made It Look To Grow Ranks Beyond 1.7%

    "The rarity of being a Black intellectual property lawyer in the United States hits home for the 1.7% of attorneys who fit that description."
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Cooley LLP
    Cooley LLP
  • Article

    Functional Claiming

    The term "functional claiming" encompasses two distinct concepts under U.S. patent law. The first is expressly provided for by statute – specifically, 35 U.S.C. § 112(f) – which provides that an element in a claim may be expressed as a means or step for performing a specified function without reciting structure in the claim.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Banner & Witcoff
    Banner & Witcoff

Showing 61–80 of 81 results

PreviousNext
Legal Intelligence Newsletters