ArticleStandard For Amending Claims In IPR May Need To ChangeThe Idle Free decision denied the patent owner’s motion to amend claims on the ground that the patent owner had not proven the tentability of the claims.United StatesIntellectual PropertyBanner & Witcoff
ArticleLaw On Divided Infringement Remains UncertainDirect infringement requires making, using, selling, offering to sell, or importing an invention.United StatesIntellectual PropertyBanner & Witcoff
ArticleChanges Coming To U.S. Patent LawCompanies interested in protecting their inventions should be aware of major changes that are coming to U.S. patent law. United StatesIntellectual PropertyBanner & Witcoff
ArticleThe First-To-File Toolbox: Intake, Checklists, TemplatesUnder the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, the United States has moved from a first-to-invent regime to a first-inventor-to-file regime.United StatesIntellectual PropertyBanner & Witcoff
ArticleThe Written Description Requirement In US Design Patent Prosecution: Background And Recent DevelopmentsOn February 6, 2014, the United States Patent and Trademark Office announced a roundtable to solicit public opinions regarding the written description requirement as applied to US design patent applications in "rare" situations.United StatesIntellectual PropertyBanner & Witcoff
ArticleU.S. Implementation Of The Hague Agreement – What You Need To KnowOn Dec. 18, 2012, U.S. President Barack Obama signed the Patent Law Treaties Implementation Act of 2012 into law. United StatesIntellectual PropertyBanner & Witcoff
ArticleU.S. Supreme Court Rules In ABC v. AereoYesterday, the U.S. Supreme Court decided American Broadcasting Companies, et al. v. Aereo.United StatesIntellectual PropertyBanner & Witcoff
ArticleIndustrial StrengthUS President Barack Obama enacted the Patent Law Treaties Implementation Act of 2012, and the Hague Agreement Implementation section of the act adds new design provisions to the patent provisions of Title 35 of the US Code.United StatesIntellectual PropertyBanner & Witcoff
ArticleA Hague Accolade: The United States Is Poised To Join An International Design Protection SystemThe United States is preparing to enact the legislation needed to implement the Hague System for the International Registration of Industrial Designs, which provides a simplified application process for obtaining design protection in jurisdictions that have become contracting parties to the Hague Agreement. United StatesIntellectual PropertyBanner & Witcoff
ArticleThe America Invents Act And What It Means For The Future Of Patent Acquisition And EnforcementOn September 8, 2011, the United States Senate approved the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (H.R. 1249), finalizing congressional acceptance of long-anticipated U.S. patent reform. United StatesIntellectual PropertyBanner & Witcoff
ArticleIP Decisions Abound At The Supreme Court In Spring 2014After leaving the realm of intellectual property law alone for decades, the United States Supreme Court has strongly reestablished its presence.United StatesIntellectual PropertyBanner & Witcoff
ArticleThe Anticipated US Ascension To Hague AgreementThe United States is on the cusp of enacting legislation that will likely lead to U.S. ascension to the Hague Agreement Concerning the International Registration of Industrial Designs.United StatesIntellectual PropertyBanner & Witcoff
ArticleTools To Protect Your Rights And Brands During gTLD EvaluationsgTLD applicants and/or trademark or brand owners will have a busy year as the gTLD evaluation process continues to unfold and ICANN, the Internet governing body started overseeing the new gTLD process. United StatesIntellectual PropertyBanner & Witcoff
ArticlePatent Developments For IT PractitionersCLS Bank International v. Alice Corp. PTY. Ltd., 717 F.3d 1269 (Fed. Cir. 2013), superseding 685 F.3d 1341 (Fed. Cir. 2012). Alice Corp. is the owner of four patents that cover a computerized trading platform for exchanging obligations in which a trusted third party settles obligations between a first and second party to eliminate settlement risk, which is the risk that only one party’s obligation will be paidUnited StatesIntellectual PropertyBanner & Witcoff
ArticleStreamlining Patent Litigation Through Non-Statutory ToolsFueled by high financial stakes and the specter of injunctions, patent litigation is incredibly complex, expensive and can involve protracted battles at every step of the process. United StatesIntellectual PropertyBanner & Witcoff
ArticleThe Biosimilars Act: The United States’ Entry Into Regulating Biosimilars And Its ImplicationsOn March 23, 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act was officially signed into law, which included provisions that greatly altered the delivery of healthcare services in the United States.United StatesIntellectual PropertyBanner & Witcoff
ArticleDevelopments In Patent Law 2013: Court Decisions December 2012 To December 2013Alice Corp. is the owner of four patents that cover a computerized trading platform for exchanging obligations in which a trusted third party settles obligations between a first and second party to eliminate settlement risk, which is the risk that only one party’s obligation will be paid. United StatesIntellectual PropertyBanner & Witcoff
ArticleDesign Patent Functionality After Egyptian Goddess And Richardson: The Assumption Of Claim Construction Dysfunction And Gumption The Federal Circuit’s decisions in Egyptian Goddess v. Swisa and Richardson v. Stanley Works have afforded district courts considerable discretion regarding how to assess functional features of claimed designs in the context of infringement. United StatesIntellectual PropertyBanner & Witcoff
ArticleBlack IP Lawyers Who've Made It Look To Grow Ranks Beyond 1.7%"The rarity of being a Black intellectual property lawyer in the United States hits home for the 1.7% of attorneys who fit that description."United StatesIntellectual PropertyCooley LLP
ArticleFunctional ClaimingThe term "functional claiming" encompasses two distinct concepts under U.S. patent law. The first is expressly provided for by statute – specifically, 35 U.S.C. § 112(f) – which provides that an element in a claim may be expressed as a means or step for performing a specified function without reciting structure in the claim. United StatesIntellectual PropertyBanner & Witcoff