Your search for ‘Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton’ returned 540 results

The defendants in this case are two pharmaceutical companies, Shire and Actavis, that manufacture a medication to treat ADHD.

Comments on the proposed regulations are due February 25, 2020.

Reflective of wider global trends, the European alternative investments industry continues to grow and attract investors.

The European Commission (the "EC") has published (see link here) slides from its Task Force for Relations with the United Kingdom regarding the future relationship with the....

In the case of Ministry of Defence and Support for Armed Forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran v International Military Services Ltd [2019]

On June 23, 2020, HM Treasury announced the first concrete "details on the UK's continued commitment to high regulatory standards for the financial services sector post-EU withdrawal"...

Consider the British prisoner dilemma over two centuries ago as a powerful lesson in incentives and how these lessons can be applied to the current pandemic.

In addition, anti-retaliation policies should outline how the company receives and responds to employees' compliance concerns.

On March 26, 2020, the Financial Conduct Authority (the "FCA") approved changes to the Listing Rules to introduce a new requirement for issuers to keep publicly available and up-to-date information regarding the rights attached to UK listed securities.

Last month, reports surfaced that fitness technology company Garmin may have made a multimillion dollar payment in response to a ransomware attack with reported links to Evil Corp...

Recent decisions of the Sixth and Second Circuits have the potential to significantly broaden the application of 28 U.S.C. § 1782 in order to compel production of documentary evidence

Welcome to the July 2, 2019 edition of our Class & Collective Action Group Newsletter, a briefing on developments in the class and collective action space.

Whether the district court abused its discretion in denying class certification on the basis that common questions would not predominate over individual ones as required by Rule 23(b)(3).

Whether the district court erred in certifying an injunction class under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(2) where the putative class sought retrospective relief and the proposed class may be both under- and over-inclusive.

In 2017, Ford and putative class counsel reached a settlement agreement that afforded two forms of relief to the proposed class.

On November 5, the SEC released its widely anticipated proposed changes to some of the procedural requirements for shareholder proposals to be included in management's proxy ...

California's 2019 legislative session has drawn to a close with passage of five amendments to the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) during the final days of the session.

On 22 June 2020, the UK Government introduced new measures allowing it to intervene in merger transactions "to maintain in the United Kingdom the capability to combat, and to mitigate the effects ...