Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 29 SEPTEMBER 2019

The Impact Of Sanctions On Arbitration: A Recent Case Study Involving The EU Sanctions Regime

Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP
Explore more from Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP

In the case of Ministry of Defence and Support for Armed Forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran v International Military Services Ltd [2019]

GlobalInternational Law
Milo Molfa
Milo Molfa
Adam Grant
Adam Grant
Sarah Haddad
Sarah Haddad

In the case of Ministry of Defence and Support for Armed Forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran v International Military Services Ltd [2019] EWHC 1994 (Comm), the High Court examined in detail the effect of the EU sanctions regime against Iran in the context of the enforcement of arbitral awards.

The High Court found that EU sanctions precluded Iran's Ministry of Defence ("MODSAF") from enforcing the interest element of an ICC award against International Military Services Limited, a UK state-owned supplier of military vehicles ("IMS"), which would have accrued during the period MODSAF has been subject to EU sanctions. The judgment provides insight into the approach of the English courts in interpreting sanctions regimes and suggests that English courts may be sympathetic under certain circumstances to the argument that obligations owed to EU sanctioned entities should be suspended while sanctions remain in place.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from