Legal 500
Log in or register
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR

© 2026 Legalease Ltd. All rights reserved

Registered company in England & Wales No. 02427356 VAT GB 321 5727 22

Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG

  • Legal 500 Trust Centre
  • Contact Us
  • home
  • Market Intelligence
  • Search

3,579 results found

Use advanced search filters to refine your search

1 filter applied

Advanced search filters

Topics
Countries
Contributor
Content type
Show options
  • Article

    Arthrex Cert Likely To Spur Previously Discussed Legislative Fix

    Back in November of 2019 the House Judiciary Committee conducted a hearing entitled "The Patent Trial and Appeal Board and the Appointments Clause: Implications of Recent Court Decisions."
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Ropes & Gray LLP
    Ropes & Gray LLP
  • Article

    Bipartisan "Advancing America's Interests Act" Seeks To Curtail Intellectual Property Enforcement At The International Trade Commission

    While Congress has been recently preoccupied with COVID-19 issues and potential U.S. Postal Service legislation, one recently introduced bipartisan bill could, if enacted, significantly affect intellectual property rights and international trade.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
Ropes & Gray LLP
Ropes & Gray LLP
  • Article

    Business Method Patent Assertions Increase Without PTAB CBM Option

    Prior to the sun setting on the Covered Business Method (CBM) patent challenges this past September, the filings of such challenges with the PTAB had tailed off significantly.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Ropes & Gray LLP
    Ropes & Gray LLP
  • Article

    Competitor Standing In PTAB Appeals Pursued To SCOTUS

    Back in July, I predicted that competitor standing in PTAB appeals was a debate destined for cert petition. That petition was filed last Wednesday in Gen. Elec. Co. v. United Techs. Corp. ("GE")...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Ropes & Gray LLP
    Ropes & Gray LLP
  • Article

    Courts Apply More Flexible Analysis To PTAB Estoppel

    Prior to last year's SAS decision, district courts split over whether non-petitioned grounds were embraced by the "reasonably could have raised" aspect of 35 U.S.C. §§ 315
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Ropes & Gray LLP
    Ropes & Gray LLP
  • Article

    Federal Circuit Applies Heightened Pleading Standard Of Fed. R. Civ. P. 9(b) To False Marking Claims

    On March 15, 2011, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a ruling in In re BP Lubricants, No. M960 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 15, 2011), holding that the heightened pleading standard of Fed. R. Civ. P. 9(b) applies to false marking claims.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Ropes & Gray LLP
    Ropes & Gray LLP
  • Article

    In Re Aqua Products: Much Ado About Nothing

    For PTAB practitioners, the en banc decision in In re Aqua Products is a complete non-event. While the decision has been embraced as a net positive for Patentees, practically speaking...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Ropes & Gray LLP
    Ropes & Gray LLP
  • Article

    Judge Gilstrap Cautions On Tactics Directed Solely To PTAB Interests

    The Defendants declined to file another 101 motion and represented that it would not file it again until after claim construction.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Ropes & Gray LLP
    Ropes & Gray LLP
  • Article

    New PTAB Ground Or Just Supporting Evidence?

    Recently, the Federal Circuit in Philips v. Google (here) explained that the Patent Trial & Appeal Board (PTAB) may only institute trial on grounds presented in a trial petition.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Ropes & Gray LLP
    Ropes & Gray LLP
  • Article

    New PTAB Precedent: Issue Joinder Is Discretionary

    As previously discussed, the Patent Trial & Appeal Board's (PTAB) new Precedential Opinion Panel (POP) has considered its first case in Proppant Express Investments v. Oren Technologies.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Ropes & Gray LLP
    Ropes & Gray LLP
  • Article

    No Arthrex Relief For Failed PTAB Petitioners

    While we await the en banc determination in Arthrex/Polaris, there have been a number of recent remands back to the PTAB (i.e., where the...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Ropes & Gray LLP
    Ropes & Gray LLP
  • Article

    Patent Owner Trick Or Treat? – Appointments Clause Debate To Jolt PTAB

    Back in June I explained the latest constitutional challenge to AIA Trial Proceedings under the Appointments Clause of the U.S. Constitution.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Ropes & Gray LLP
    Ropes & Gray LLP
  • Article

    PTAB Denies Petition Overlooking Objective Indicia Of Non-Obviousness

    The submission of so-called "objective indicia of non-obviousness" at the PTAB is rarely effective, especially in the predictable arts (i.e., mechanical/electrical).
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Ropes & Gray LLP
    Ropes & Gray LLP
  • Article

    PTAB Designates AIA Decisions Informative

    The second decision outlines requirements for taking foreign depositions.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Ropes & Gray LLP
    Ropes & Gray LLP
  • Article

    PTAB Discovery Of JDG Agreements

    It can be an uphill battle to secure additional discovery at the Patent Trial & Appeal Board (PTAB) given the "interests of justice" standard of IPR proceedings.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Ropes & Gray LLP
    Ropes & Gray LLP
  • Article

    PTAB Fast-Track…Not So Fast

    Last week the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) announced plans for the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) to begin accepting petitions for expedited resolution of ex parte appeals.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Ropes & Gray LLP
    Ropes & Gray LLP
  • Article

    PTAB Focuses On Customer/Supplier Relationship In 314(a) Denial

    Extending a trend started last spring, the PTAB is looking more closely at AIA trial petitions coming from separate parties.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Ropes & Gray LLP
    Ropes & Gray LLP
  • Article

    PTAB Highlights Successful Application Of Objective Indicia

    Yesterday, the Patent Trial & Appeal Board (PTAB) designated one new precedential case, and two informative decisions directed to the application of objective indicia to obviousness determinations.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Ropes & Gray LLP
    Ropes & Gray LLP
  • Article

    PTAB Judicial Conference Moves To San Jose & Dallas

    While the summer months are relatively quiet when it comes to marquee CLE events and bar organization gatherings, the Patent Trial & Appeal Board (PTAB) is providing a rare opportunity for stakeholders in late July.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Ropes & Gray LLP
    Ropes & Gray LLP
  • Article

    PTAB Sovereign Immunity Dispute Heads To CAFC

    State-affiliated entities enjoy immunity from suit in federal courts under the 11th amendment.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Ropes & Gray LLP
    Ropes & Gray LLP
  • Showing 821–840 of 3579 results

    PreviousNext
    Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics