Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 MAY 2020

PTAB Highlights Successful Application Of Objective Indicia

Ropes & Gray LLP
Ropes & Gray LLP
Contributor
Ropes & Gray LLP

Ropes & Gray LLP

Ropes & Gray is one of the world’s most respected law firms, with offices in key business and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Ropes & Gray LLP

Yesterday, the Patent Trial & Appeal Board (PTAB) designated one new precedential case, and two informative decisions directed to the application of objective indicia to obviousness determinations.

United StatesIntellectual Property

New Precedent/Informative Decisions Demonstrate Nexus Considerations

Yesterday, the Patent Trial & Appeal Board (PTAB) designated one new precedential case, and two informative decisions directed to the application of objective indicia to obviousness determinations. Collectively, the decisions outline the necessary degree of nexus between subject claims and submitted objective indicia.

Lectrosonics, Inc. v. Zaxcom, Inc., Case IPR2018-01129, Paper 33 (PTAB Jan. 24, 2020) (precedential, here)

Considering Fox Factory, Inc. v. SRAM, LLC, 944 F.3d 1366, 1373 (Fed. Cir. 2019), this decision determines that the challenged claims are unpatentable because the Patent Owner did not establish a nexus between the claims and objective evidence of non-obviousness. This decision determines, however, that the Patent Owner's amended claims are patentable because the Patent Owner did establish a nexus to objective evidence of non-obviousness, including long-felt need and industry

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from