987 results found

On 22 December 2015, the Higher Regional Court of Frankfurt (the "Court") issued a ruling on appeal concerning the selective distribution system of Deuter, a producer of quality backpacks.

In its recent judgment, the Regional Court of Stuttgart held that it could leave this question undecided.

In a newly released case report, the German Federal Cartel Office explains its stance towards the restrictions on the use of third party internet platforms imposed by adidas.

The settlement procedure is also designed to reduce the number of appeals against the HCC's decisions before administrative courts.

It upheld the ruling by the District Court of The Hague of 10 October 2018.

Hence, the Patent Court of Appeal concluded that the storage of goods in warehouses does not constitute an attempt or preparation of a trade mark or copyright infringement.

Following a decision issued on 30 October 2014, the Commercial Court of England and Wales ("CC") has denied a request made on behalf of a number of UK retailers

With reference to the case at hand, the ECJ found information concerning the difference in store sizes on which the price comparison is based to be material.

In 2005, NMB (principal) and UNAMAR (commercial agent) entered into a commercial agency agreement for the operation of NMB's container liner shipping service.

InBev brought a cease-and-desist action before the Court for infringement of its Jupiler trademark.

On 20 March 2014, the President of the Brussels Commercial Court ruled on a dispute between Christian Louboutin and Van Dalen Footwear B.V.

On 8 June 2011, the Brussels Commercial Court (the "Court") issued a judgment in a case between Powerdrinks Group BVBA ("Powerdrinks") and Red Bull GmbH ("Red Bull"), two producers of energy drinks, regarding the protection of Red Bull’s colour trade mark.

The case ended up with the Court which first examined if Belgian courts had jurisdiction over Skype.

In a press release issued on 15 April 2015, the European Commission addressed the following issues regarding the Google case...

On 22 May 2012, the General Court of the European Union annulled a decision of the European Commission.

On 25 July 2018, the Court of Justice of the European Union handed down its judgment concerning energy labels in a case involving Dyson and BSH (ECJ, 25 July 2018, Case C-632/16, Dyson Ltd and Dyson BV v. BSH Home Appliances NV).

The Court of Justice of the European Union responded to a preliminary question relating to unfair consumer contract terms (Case C-226/12, Constructora Principado SA v. José Ignacio Menéndez Álvarez).

The request was made in the context of a dispute between Ms Froukje Faber and a garage called Autobedrijf Hazet Ochten BV.