Legal 500
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • News & Developments
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • News & Developments
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR

© 2026 Legalease Ltd. All rights reserved

Registered company in England & Wales No. 02427356 VAT GB 321 5727 22

Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG

  • Data Protection policies
  • Cookies Policy
  • Supplier Code of Conduct
  • Modern Slavery and Human Trafficking Statement
  • Contact Us
  • home
  • Market Intelligence
  • Search

4,410 results found

Use advanced search filters to refine your search

1 filter applied

Advanced search filters

Topics
Countries
Contributor
Content type
Show options
  • Article

    Recent Decisions Shed Some Light On Scope Of AIA Estoppel

    When the America Invents Act legislation was first proposed, many thought its broad estoppel provisions might be a deterrent for parties considering post-grant proceedings.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Reply Evidence Sufficient To Establish Printed Publication Status Of Reference

    In doing so, the Federal Circuit explained that the PTAB properly considered evidence submitted by Twitter in its reply brief that was not previously submitted in Twitter's IPR petitions.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    SaMD Series: Open Source Licensing And Trade Secrets

    Software as a Medical Device – also referred to as SaMD – is one of the fastest growing innovations in the medical device industry.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Security And Privacy: Storing Trade Secrets In The Cloud—Bad Idea?

    Cybersecurity and the security of the data in the cloud is a hot topic. The number of companies hacked and the magnitude of losses have been growing at an alarming rate.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    September 2019 - Last Month At The Federal Circuit Podcast Series

    Welcome to the Last Month at the Federal Circuit, a look at recent Federal Circuit decisions impacting the intellectual property community.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Staying True To The Specification: Federal Circuit Vacates Preliminary Injunction Based On Unsupported Claim Constructions

    The Federal Circuit vacated a preliminary injunction in a patent infringement case involving electrical outlet cover products, finding that the district court made critical errors in its claim construction analysis. The appellate court determined that the lower court improperly imposed unsupported limitations on key patent terms and incorrectly applied a presumption of irreparable harm.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Supreme Court Allows Recovery Of Foreign Lost Profit Damages

    In a highly-anticipated case examining the geographical reach of U.S. patents, WesternGeco LLC v. ION Geophysical Corp., No. 16-1011 (S. Ct. June 22, 2018), the Supreme Court ...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Surfs Up! Riding The Big Wave Of IPR Appeals At The Federal Circuit

    In FY2014, more than 1,300 IPR requests were filed at the Patent Office and in FY2015, more than 1,600.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    The First IPR Is In The Books – Analysis Of The PTAB’s Decision In "Garmin V. Cuozzo" : A Three-Part Series

    On November 13, 2013, the PTAB issued its first final written decision in an IPR. Garmin International, Inc. v. Cuozzo Speed Techs., LLC, Case IPR2012-00001.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    The Latest Unsuccessful Inter Partes Review Petitions

    While much invective has been thrown around concerning IPR proceedings in the past few years, the institution rate of IPRs continues to fall...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Time Bar Decisions Cannot Be Judicially Reviewed

    In Thryv, Inc. v. Click-to-Call Techs, LP, the Supreme Court held that the PTAB's determination of whether a petition is timely under 35 U.S.C. § 315(b) ...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Trends In IPR Institution: Part 1—Ex Parte Art Or Arguments

    The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) has discretion under 35 US.C. § 325(d) to decline institution of inter partes review when "the same or substantially the same prior art or arguments"...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Trends In IPR Institution: Part 2—Inter Partes Art Or Arguments

    The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) has discretion under 35 US.C. § 325(d) to decline institution of inter partes review when "the same or substantially the same prior art or arguments"...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    USPTO Extends Time For Comments On Proposed Rules

    The USPTO has extended the period for public comment on the proposed amendments to the rules of practice before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    What Prince Can Teach All Companies About Rebranding

    The death of Prince Rogers Nelson came as a shock to the world. It also gave us an opportunity to reflect on the vast accomplishments of the man known by so many names.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Yin And Yang: Design Patents And Trade Dress Rights

    When protecting innovative three-dimensional designs, many often consider two distinct options: design patents or trade dress.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Lack Of Jurisdiction Flatlines Pulse's Appeal

    The Federal Circuit in Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse Electronics, Inc., No. 16-2006 held that it lacked jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1295(a)(1) and 1292(c)(2) to hear an appeal from a district court's...
    United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Podcast: August 2019 - Last Month At The Federal Circuit Podcast Series

    Welcome to the Last Month at the Federal Circuit–a look at recent Federal Circuit decisions impacting the intellectual property community.
    United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Practice Pointer: How Are Judges Assigned To Federal Circuit Cases?

    Many parties appearing before the Federal Circuit are unaware of how Judges are selected to preside over their disputes. Like other courts, the Federal Circuit has sought to achieve a blind allocation...
    United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Practice Pointer: Keeping Track Of Time

    When arguing before the Federal Circuit, three lights on the podium serve as timers.
    United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Showing 421–440 of 4410 results

    PreviousNext
    Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics