Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 NOVEMBER 2015

The Latest Unsuccessful Inter Partes Review Petitions

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Contributor
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP is one of the world’s largest firms focusing on...

View firm profile
Explore more from Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

While much invective has been thrown around concerning IPR proceedings in the past few years, the institution rate of IPRs continues to fall...

United StatesIntellectual Property

While much invective has been thrown around concerning IPR proceedings in the past few years, the institution rate of IPRs continues to fall, whether due to parties becoming savvy to proceedings, an improvement in the quality of patents being challenged, or due to developing statutory interpretations before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) and the Federal Circuit. It is still early days, and there are many aspects of IPRs that do not have judicial guidance yet. In this article, Finnegan attorneys  Thomas L. Irving and  Samhitha C. Muralidhar examine some threshold bases for IPR petition denial and current patent owners' success rates.

Previously published by Law360

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from