Legal 500
Log in or register
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR

© 2026 Legalease Ltd. All rights reserved

Registered company in England & Wales No. 02427356 VAT GB 321 5727 22

Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG

  • Legal 500 Trust Centre
  • Contact Us
  • home
  • Market Intelligence
  • Search

1,149 results found

Use advanced search filters to refine your search

1 filter applied

Advanced search filters

Topics
Countries
Contributor
Content type
Show options
  • Article

    Latest Innovation Statistics Reflect Poorly - But Possibly Falsely - On Australasia

    There are a number of measures of a country’s "innovativeness". When each of government R&D spend, number of academic publications, GNP, number of successful spin-off companies, etc. are reduced to a "per capita" basis, one can begin to get a feel for where the "innovation hotspots" are across the globe.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Licensors´ Obligation Not To Frustrate Licensees´ Use Of Trade Mark

    In JLCS Pty Ltd v Squires Loft City Steakhouse Pty Ltd ([2008] FCA 867, June 12 2008), the Federal Court of Australia considered two main issues. The first was the effect, if any, of a change in ownership of a restaurant to a licence to operate the restaurant under the name Squire's Loft.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    New PCT pilot programme with EPO – what Australian patent applicants need to know

    Australian patent applicants will soon have access to a new international filing option, with IP Australia & the EPO launching a two-year PCT pilot programme.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    New Zealand – Amendments to the Patents Regulations 2014 clear up a few uncertainties

    None of these 'uncertainties' were deemed significant enough to warrant immediate amendment to the 2014 Regulations.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    No Sweet Rewards For Mars

    Mars Australia Pty Ltd brought an action against Sweet Rewards Pty Ltd alleging passing off, misleading conduct and trade mark infringement.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Progress toward a unitary patent examination for Australia and New Zealand

    The proposed unitary examination process is the first step towards a single trans-Tasman patent application process.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Software and Business Methods in the US: Updated Guidelines for Determining Patentability

    In the US, the law is in a state of flux in relation to precisely what constitutes patentable subject matter, particularly in terms of business methods, software, and the like. Users of the patent system find themselves caught in an uncomfortable fix between a controversial Federal Court decision, and what is expected to be a landmark Supreme Court judgement sometime next year. In an attempt to create stability during this unusual period, the USPTO has issued a new set of guidelines to Examiners
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Software patents in Australia: Hope in a High Court appeal

    The RPL case is on appeal to the HCA, which has never considered the patentability of computer-implemented technologies.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Solar D – letting the sunshine (vitamin D) in!

    Solar D sunscreen, developed and commercialised in Australia, is an new product to revolutionise the sun care market.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    The end of the innovation patent – finally.... eventually!

    The innovation patent will be phased out over 8 years from 26 August 2021 to 26 August 2029.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    The New Zealand Patents Bill - versus the irresistible force versus the immovable object

    New Zealand businesses and overseas entities wishing to do business in New Zealand are governed by obsolete legislation.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Trade Mark Classification of Virtual Goods and NFTs in Australia

    IP Australia released new guidance on trade mark classification of emerging technologies, including NFTs and virtual goods.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Who owns a nickname? AUNTY HELEN trade mark registration refused in New Zealand

    This case differs from usual oppositions, in that it involves a nickname not used as a trade mark by the opponent.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    China update: Advantages of selecting the European Patent Office (EPO) as International Searching Authority (ISA) for Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) applications

    If the Chinese PCT applications are nationalised in Europe, there is a financial incentive to designate EPO as the ISA.
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    China update: Interim Measures announced before new patent law goes live

    Applicants should immediately and carefully review how the patent Interim Measures affect their IP protection strategies.
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Patent rules changed for AI and Bistream

    China updated its Patent Examination Guidelines—effective 1 January 2026—to introduce major revisions, including new rules for AI & Bitstream technologies.
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Guidelines for AI-related invention applications (trial) released

    Inventor qualification/identification, for Artificial Intelligence related (AI-related) patent applications.
    ChinaTechnology
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    PCT Minimum Documentation Expands To Improve Search Quality

    Widening of international searches for patents
    GlobalIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Is it important to build a SEP portfolio?

    What is a Standard Essential Patent (SEP)? Why build a SEP portfolio?
    SingaporeIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    New initiatives reduce patent examination burdens

    IPOS has now introduced initiatives to reduce extension fees and the formalities associated with PCT search reports.
    SingaporeIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Showing 461–480 of 1149 results

    PreviousNext
    Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics