98 results found

On January 12, the Federal Court of Appeal dismissed Apotex's appeal of Justice Barnes decision holding Canadian Patent No 1,292,693 valid and infringed.

In E Mishan & Sons v Supertek Canada, 2016 FC 986, Justice Hughes of the Federal Court dismissed Supertek's claim for damages stemming from statements made by Mishan. Both Mishan and Supertek sell expandable garden hoses in Canada.

On September 6, 2016, the Court of Appeal dismissed Nova Chemicals Corporations appeal from a judgment finding its SURPASS product infringes Canadian Patent No. 2,160,705 directed generally to polyethylene film products, such as plastic garbage bags and food wrapping.

Seedlings Life Science Ventures LLC v. Pfizer Canada Inc., 2018 FC 443 is the second decision (following Live Face on Web, LLC v. Soldan Fence and Metals (2009) Ltd.) ...

Health Canada proposed amendments to the Food and Drug Regulations and the Medical Devices Regulations to protect against the harms caused by shortages of drugs and medical devices.

On October 6, 2016, Justice Southcott dismissed Cascade's patent infringement action against Kinshofer in a motion for summary trial. Kinshofer did not contest the validity of the 065 Patent but asserted a defence of non-infringement.

On August 23, 2016, the Federal Court released the public judgment and reasons by Justice Brown in 2016 FC 857.

HERC Equipment Rentals operates a construction and industrial equipment rental business in Hamilton and Mississauga. HERC and HERTZ (the car rental company) have had business dealings for 15 years and have operations in close proximity to each other.

In its judgment dated February 22, 2018, the Federal Court of Appeal dismissed Eli Lilly's appeal from the judgment of Justice O'Reilly that had resulted in an award of $70 million in favour of Teva Canada.

Justice Fothergill's recent decision establishes that a prior favourable decision under the NOC Regulations cannot be relied upon by a generic pharmaceutical company to disentitle a patentee to an election between damages and an accounting of profits once the patent has been found to be valid and infringed.

The Federal Court of Appeal issued strong reasons reprimanding the Patented Medicines Prices Review Board for overstepping its jurisdiction.

On February 9, 2017, the Federal Court granted a motion brought by Sleep Country Canada Inc. for an interlocutory injunction preventing Sears Canada Inc. from using the slogan "THERE IS NO REASON TO BUY A MATRESS ANYWHERE ELSE".

In Janssen Inc. v. Actavis Pharma Company, 2016 FC 1361, Janssen sought an order prohibiting the Minister of Health from issuing a Notice of Compliance to Actavis for a generic version of the ADHD drug CONCERTA.

In Maxwell Realty Inc. v. Omax Realty Ltd., Justice McDonald considered an ex-parte motion for default judgement for trade-mark infringement.

In Les Marques Metro / Metro Brands S.E.N.C. v. 1161396 Ontario Inc., 2017 FC 806, Metro appealed a Trade-marks Opposition Board decision which allowed S&M Enterprises' registration...

On May 25th, 2018 the Federal Court of Canada released its decision in Safe Gaming System Inc v. Atlantic Lottery Corporation involving claims 1 and 6 Canadian Patent No. 2,331,238...

On September 19, 2016, Prothonotary Tabib granted, in part, Apotex' motion to amend its statement of defence and counterclaim in an infringement action concerning Apotex' Apo-Travoprost Z product.