Legal 500
Log in or register
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR

© 2026 Legalease Ltd. All rights reserved

Registered company in England & Wales No. 02427356 VAT GB 321 5727 22

Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG

  • Legal 500 Trust Centre
  • Contact Us
  • home
  • Market Intelligence
  • Search

5,676 results found

Use advanced search filters to refine your search

1 filter applied

Advanced search filters

Topics
Countries
Contributor
Content type
Show options
  • Article

    Battles That Decide Wars

    It is often said that noncompete cases differ from other types of civil litigation in that the initial battle in the case often decides the war
    United StatesEmployment and HR
    Foley Hoag LLP
    Foley Hoag LLP
  • Article

    California Case Highlights Need To Look Before You Leap . . . And File Suit

    Late last month, the California Court of Appeal upheld a $180,000 award of sanctions against an employer for bringing a baseless trade secret misappropriation suit.
    United StatesEmployment and HR
    Foley Hoag LLP
    Foley Hoag LLP
Article

Employer Can Be Liable For Negligently Terminating An Employee Based On Co-Worker’s Discriminatory Conduct

The First Circuit held in Velazquez-Perez v. Developers Diversified Realty Corp. that an employer may be liable under Title VII for negligently terminating an employee.
United StatesEmployment and HR
Foley Hoag LLP
Foley Hoag LLP
  • Article

    Employment Bulletin - October 19, 2009

    Recently, in affirming a decision by the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination ("MCAD"), the Massachusetts Appeals Court held that a racial epithet can constitute discrimination in terms and conditions of employment.
    United StatesEmployment and HR
    Foley Hoag LLP
    Foley Hoag LLP
  • Article

    MA Senate's Proposed Noncompete Bill Is MUCH More Stringent Than House Bill

    The Massachusetts Senate's Committee on Rules is advancing legislation on noncompetes that differs markedly from the bill passed by the House and described here last week.
    United StatesEmployment and HR
    Foley Hoag LLP
    Foley Hoag LLP
  • Article

    Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Holds That Former Employee Can Bring Retaliation Claim Based On Conduct Which Occurred Two Years After The Termination Of Employment

    Last week, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court held that an employer may be liable under Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 151B to a former employee for retaliatory conduct that occurs after the employment relationship has ended.
    United StatesEmployment and HR
    Foley Hoag LLP
    Foley Hoag LLP
  • Article

    New Momentum For Noncompete Reform?

    This blog has reported on efforts over the past few years to enact legislation that would either prohibit or significantly reform the law of noncompetes in Massachusetts.
    United StatesEmployment and HR
    Foley Hoag LLP
    Foley Hoag LLP
  • Article

    NLRB General Counsel To Pursue Federal Labor Claims Of Student Athletes

    Last week, NLRB General Counsel Jennifer Abruzzo joined the agency's regional prosecutors in concluding that some NCAA student athletes are employees, instructing the Board's regional prosecutors...
    United StatesEmployment and HR
    Foley Hoag LLP
    Foley Hoag LLP
  • Article

    NLRB Holds That A Ban On Videotaping Workplace Conversations Is Unlawful

    Recently, the National Labor Relations Board held that an employer violated Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act by maintaining a policy that prohibited employees from making certain audio or video recordings in the workplace.
    United StatesEmployment and HR
    Foley Hoag LLP
    Foley Hoag LLP
  • Article

    NLRB Issues Narrowed Joint Employer Rule

    Yesterday, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) released the final version of its new joint employer rule, which limits the circumstances in which franchisors and businesses that use employees
    United StatesEmployment and HR
    Foley Hoag LLP
    Foley Hoag LLP
  • Article

    NLRB Upends 50 Years Of Precedent, Narrows Employer Options For Secret Ballot Elections In Union Organizing Campaigns

    On August 25, 2023, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) issued a decision that significantly narrows employers' options in contesting union organizing efforts through secret ballot elections.
    United StatesEmployment and HR
    Foley Hoag LLP
    Foley Hoag LLP
  • Article

    NLRB Vacates Hy-Brand Joint Employment Liability Standard Because Of Board Member Conflict

    On February 26, 2018, the National Labor Relations Board vacated its recent ruling in the Hy-Brand Industrial Contractors, Inc. case that had set a new standard for determining joint employer status.
    United StatesEmployment and HR
    Foley Hoag LLP
    Foley Hoag LLP
  • Article

    President Biden Orders Increased COVID-19 Protections In The Workplace

    On January 21, 2021, President Joe Biden used his first full day in office to issue an Executive Order focused on increased COVID-19 protections for the nation's workers, including the most...
    United StatesEmployment and HR
    Foley Hoag LLP
    Foley Hoag LLP
  • Article

    Proposed Rule Would End EEOC Employer Demographic Reporting Requirements

    The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has voted to propose rescinding its decades-old requirement that employers submit annual EEO-1 reports detailing workforce demographics by race and sex. This proposed rule change would eliminate reporting obligations for private employers with 100+ employees and certain federal contractors, though the agency maintains it will still request records during discrimination charge investigations.
    United StatesEmployment and HR
    Foley Hoag LLP
    Foley Hoag LLP
  • Article

    Restricting Employees' Internet Conduct May Violate Federal Labor Law

    The rise of social media websites has created a host of challenges for employers.
    United StatesEmployment and HR
    Foley Hoag LLP
    Foley Hoag LLP
  • Article

    SJC: Employees Who Settled Wage Act Claims Were Entitled To Award Of Attorneys' Fees

    The SJC affirmed the lower court's decision.
    United StatesEmployment and HR
    Foley Hoag LLP
    Foley Hoag LLP
  • Article

    Supreme Court Adopts More Expansive View Of FLSA Exemptions

    In so holding, the Court rejected the principle, cited by the Ninth Circuit, that the FLSA exemptions should be construed narrowly.
    United StatesEmployment and HR
    Foley Hoag LLP
    Foley Hoag LLP
  • Article

    Supreme Court Clarifies When Job Transfers Can Serve As A Basis For Title VII Claims

    On April 17, 2024, the Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in Muldrow v. St. Louis that rejected a heightened injury standard for Title VII claims based on job transfers...
    United StatesEmployment and HR
    Foley Hoag LLP
    Foley Hoag LLP
  • Article

    Supreme Court Delivers Major Blow To Public Sector Unions

    On June 27, 2018, in a 5-4 decision in Janus v. AFSCME, the United States Supreme Court overruled longstanding precedent and held that public employees who are not members of a union elected...
    United StatesEmployment and HR
    Foley Hoag LLP
    Foley Hoag LLP
  • Article

    Supreme Judicial Court Holds That Doctor Is Not Required To Arbitrate Discrimination Claims

    Yesterday, the Supreme Judicial Court held in Warfield v. Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, that a broad arbitration clause in an employment agreement did not apply to discrimination claims under Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 151B.
    United StatesEmployment and HR
    Foley Hoag LLP
    Foley Hoag LLP
  • Showing 861–880 of 5676 results

    PreviousNext
    Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics