Legal 500
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions

    • Submissions

    • Future Lawyers

  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers

    • Barristers’ Sets

    • Networks

    • Interview with…

  • In-House

    • In-House Content

    • GC Powerlist

  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products

    • Legal Business

    • News & Developments

    • About us

      • Legal 500

      • FAQs

      • Marketing

      • Careers

      • Contact us

  • Comparative Guides

  • Events

  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500

  • FAQs

  • Marketing

  • Careers

  • Contact us

  • Deutschland DE

  • Paris FR

  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions

    • Submissions

    • Future Lawyers

  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers

    • Barristers’ Sets

    • Networks

    • Interview with…

  • In-House

    • In-House Content

    • GC Powerlist

  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products

    • Legal Business

    • News & Developments

    • About us

      • Legal 500

      • FAQs

      • Marketing

      • Careers

      • Contact us

  • Comparative Guides

  • Events

  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500

  • FAQs

  • Marketing

  • Careers

  • Contact us

  • Deutschland DE

  • Paris FR

© 2026 Legalease Ltd. All rights reserved

Registered company in England & Wales No. 02427356 VAT GB 321 5727 22

Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG

  • Data Protection policies
  • Cookies Policy
  • Supplier Code of Conduct
  • Modern Slavery and Human Trafficking Statement
  • Contact Us
  • Article

    Commission Reverses Initial Determination That Complainant Lacks Standing In Certain Electronic Devices (337-TA-1200)

    On March 17, 2021, the ITC issued the public version of its opinion reversing ALJ Cameron R. Elliot's initial determination ("ID") that Complainant Universal Electronics, Inc. ("UEI")...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Oblon
    Oblon
  • Article

    Decs, Slides, And Video[Tape]: Utilizing Non-Patent Literature In IPR

    As reported in the decision, Medtronic distributed a video demonstration and a related slide presentation to spinal surgeons at various industry meetings and conferences in 2003.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Oblon
    Oblon
  • Article

    In Re Rudy And The PTO 101 Guidance

    The USPTO 101 Guidance document has been under a cloud when Judge Brinkema refused to follow the guidance in Cleveland Clinic Found. V. True Health Diagnostics LLC., affirmed at 760 F. App'x. 1013...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Oblon
    Oblon
  • Article

    ITC Institutes Investigation (337-TA-1243) Of Certain Active Matrix OLED Display Devices

    On January 27, 2021, the ITC issued a press release announcing their vote to institute an investigation in Certain Active Matrix OLED Display Devices and Components Thereof (Inv. No. 337-TA-1243).
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Oblon
    Oblon
  • Article

    ITC Institutes Investigation (337-TA-1252) In Certain Robotic Floor Cleaning Devices

    On February 26, 2021, the ITC issued a Notice of Investigation in Certain Robotic Floor Cleaning Devices and Components Thereof (Inv. No. 337-TA-1252).
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Oblon
    Oblon
  • Article

    No Retroactive IPR Estoppel In Co-Pending Litigation

    35 U.S.C. § 315(e)(1) and (2) are the statutory provisions regarding petitioner estoppel in IPRs.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Oblon
    Oblon
  • Article

    Sisvel – PTAB Guidance On A Proposed Amendment In An IPR Is Not Binding On The PTAB

    In Sisvel Int'l S.A. v. Sierra Wireless, Inc., Appeal nos. 2022-1387 and 2022-1492, (Fed. Cir. 2023) the Court considered this issue of when was a claim broadened in a post grant proceeding.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Oblon
    Oblon
  • Article

    "Statutory" Obviousness-Type Double Patenting for Pharma Patents?

    In short, the bill presumes obviousness-type double patenting of any subsequent orange book listed patent and shifts the burden to the patentee to demonstrate otherwise.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Oblon
    Oblon
  • Article

    The Recent HHS' Plan For Greater FDA – USPTO Collaboration To Lower Drug Prices: Why Pharma Patent Counsel Needs To Review FDA Submissions

    In a purported effort to lower drug prices, the Department of Health and Human Services recently released a proposed plan calling for the US Food and Drug Administration to work with the US Patent and Trademark Office, …
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Oblon
    Oblon
  • Article

    Travatan Z® Patent Survives IPR: A Lesson In Successfully Arguing Hindsight Bias

    Hindsight bias is not simply an old chestnut argued ad infinitum in response to obviousness challenges.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Oblon
    Oblon
  • Article

    Traversing Obviousness Rejections

    In Chemours Co. FC LC v. Daikin Industries Ltd. et al., 4 F.4th 1370 (Fed. Cir. 2021) reversed a PTAB decision finding the following claim to be unpatentable as obvious:
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Oblon
    Oblon
  • Article

    US Court Ruling Will Affect Royalty Rate Calculations For Licence Agreements

    Andrew Ollis and Frank West authored an article featured in the June 15, 2022 on line edition of IAM Magazine, regarding the Federal Circuit's June 3, 2022 holding...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Oblon
    Oblon
  • Article

    USPTO Launches National Council For Expanding American Innovation

    On Monday, September 16, 2020, the USPTO issued a press release announcing the launch of "a major initiative aimed at expanding invention, innovation, and entrepreneurship in the United States."
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Oblon
    Oblon
  • Article

    USPTO Publishes Its Second PTAB Trial Practice Guide Update

    On July 16, 2019, the Patent Office published its 2019 Trial Practice Guide Update, a copy of which can be found here.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Oblon
    Oblon
  • Article

    Written Description And Creating Ranges From Examples

    At the close of last year, the Federal Circuit affirmed a decision by the PTAB in IPR2019-00329 that a claimed range created from examples was not patentable because it lacked written description...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Oblon
    Oblon
  • Article

    Written Description Of A Numerical Range

    The Federal Circuit on February 9 decided another written description case involving a range not found in ipsis verbis in the patent specification in RAI Strategic Holdings Inc. v. Philip...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Oblon
    Oblon
  • Article

    Assignor Estoppel And IPR's: Possible Impact Of Arista v. Cisco On Employment Agreements And Assignment Agreements

    In a November 9, 2018 decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled that the doctrine of assignor estoppel does not apply in the inter partes review (IPR) context ...
    United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Oblon
    Oblon
  • Article

    Supreme Court Hears Oral Arguments On Affordable Care Act: Will Biosimilars Survive?

    Today the Supreme Court heard arguments in Texas v. Azar that the Affordable Care Act (ACA)'s individual coverage mandate is unconstitutional.
    United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Oblon
    Oblon
  • Article

    Tribal Immunity In IPR Is Dealt A Death Blow By The Federal Circuit

    The Federal Circuit issued its decision in Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe et al v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al (18-1638) on July 20, 2018.
    United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Oblon
    Oblon
  • Article

    Commission Issues Public Version Of Opinion In Certain Motorized Self-Balancing Vehicles (337-TA-1000)

    On February 8, 2021, the ITC issued the public version of its opinion in Certain Motorized Self-Balancing Vehicles (Inv. No. 337-TA-1000).
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Oblon
    Oblon

Showing 261–280 of 698 results

PreviousNext
Legal Intelligence Newsletters