638 results found

In the case of General Industries Workers Union of South Africa obo Mgedezi and Others v Swissport SA Ltd and Another [2019] 9 BALR 954 the three issues, all hinging on section 198A(3)(b) of the Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995.

In National Credit Regulator v National Consumer Tribunal and Others and Similar Matters, the South African Supreme Court of Appeal ("SCA") provided clarity over whether on-the-road ("OTR")...

On 4 November 2025, the Pretoria High Court delivered an important judgment on the nature and limits of the statutory framework governing the internal processes of the HPCSA.

The end of February 2020 marks the anniversary of an important court victory which confirmed the rights of asylum seekers to access benefits from the Unemployment Insurance Fund ("UIF").

In South Africa, the Advertising Standards Authority ("ASA") is often used as a forum for trade mark-style disputes.

Two US trade mark cases have dominated the headlines, and one of these has made it all the way to the US Supreme Court.

In Solidarity v Minister of Small Business Development and Others; Afriforum v Minister of Tourism and Others, the Pretoria High Court held that the state, acting under the regulations published in terms of...

A recent Gauteng High Court judgment confirms that mandatory court-annexed mediation cannot be avoided simply because parties are hostile toward each other or believe the process will be futile. The court ordered an uncooperative defendant to participate in mediation, establishing that only exceptional circumstances will excuse parties from the process introduced by the Directive and Protocol.

The Judicial Commission of Inquiry into allegations of State Capture exacerbated the need for entities in South Africa to know more about their clients, vendors, agents, partners etc.

In South Africa, the legal system is designed to uphold justice, provide recourse for wrongs, and ensure fairness for all parties.

What happens when an auction reserve price (for immovable property) has not been reached in terms of Uniform Rule 46A? Rule 46A of the Uniform Rules of Court aims to regulate the manner...

What are the implications of your legal representatives binding you to agreements you did not consent to? It is a common cause in the legal fraternity that most clients do not have the requisite legal knowledge to...

On 2 June 2020 the Minister of Justice and Correctional Services, Mr Ronald Ozzy Lamola updated the directives Copyright Amendment Billregarding access to the justice service points under...

In Independent Communications Authority of South Africa ("ICASA") and Others v Open Heaven Community Radio ("Open Heaven") and Others, the South African Supreme Court of Appeal ("SCA")...

ENSafrica successfully represented Virgin Active in a South African Advertising Standards Authority ("ASA") matter, regarding a Virgin Active TV advertisement that used the expression "get off your ass".

When deciding whether a party should be evicted, a Court must take into consideration all relevant circumstances and factors, and then determine whether the eviction would be just and equitable.

Eviction applications frequently pit the two sides of our society against one another. The applicant is invariably the property owner who has the resources necessary to access the civil justice system.

The Tax Court had to consider whether the taxpayer discharged the onus to prove that "exceptional circumstances" existed for an extension of the period allowed for the taxpayer to object to an assessment.