4,286 results found

In the recent decision of Grosvenor Orlando Associates v. HCP Grosvenor Orlando LLC, Vice Chancellor Glasscock determined the parties’ cross-motions for judgment on the pleadings.

Bass, Berry & Sims attorneys Danielle Sloane and Morgan Tandy authored an article for G2 Intelligence examining four recent court cases involving labs and lab owners.

The Delaware Superior Court recently commenced a new web based initiative related to civil case management.

There are many benefits to having a case in federal court as opposed to state court.

Now that you've likely had your fill of turkey sandwiches, turkey salad, turkey soup and the like, there is a new development on which to focus.

The underlying dispute involved allegations of breach of warranty and deceptive trade practices based on a sale of an allegedly defective car.

Duane Morris partner Benjamin Shatz addresses reader feedback and shares insights prompted by previous columns in his latest "Exceptionally Appealing" piece. The column explores various tidbits and responses from the legal community, offering practical perspectives on appellate practice and procedure. Readers will find valuable commentary drawn from real-world reactions to Shatz's earlier writings on appellate law.

I previously blogged on the law that passed the PA House and PA Senate which expanded the exceptions for jury duty service in Pennsylvania.

WilmerHale partners examine a proposed amendment to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45(c) that would extend trial courts' subpoena power for remote testimony nationwide. The analysis explores how this change would reshape disputes over distant witnesses while clarifying what strategic considerations trial lawyers should weigh when deciding whether remote testimony makes sense for their cases.

In the Public Interest is excited to present its second annual miniseries examining notable decisions recently issued by the US Supreme Court. In this episode, co-host Michael Dawson is joined...

Before turning over information in response to a subpoena, wholeheartedly assess whether the response will disclose your company’s proprietary information.

Jim Bergenn was a guest on WTIC 1080's Brian and Company where he discussed a judge's findings that forensic scientist Henry Lee...

A Massachusetts federal court allowed a defendant to amend its answer late in litigation to add a Chapter 93A counterclaim based on newly discovered internal communications.

Article from Waller's Media Mentions

Partner and Chair of Medical Devices, Julianne M. Hartzell and associate David N. Patariu co-authored the article "More Than a Judge, Shadur Became a Teacher on Civil Procedure" ...

Duane Morris partners Benjamin Shatz and Sylvia (Yoo Jin) Cheong explore the nuances of appellate modifications in their latest "Exceptionally Appealing" column published in the Daily Journal. The piece examines the procedural and strategic considerations attorneys must navigate when seeking to modify court decisions.

The court overseeing statewide opioid litigation in New York recently made a ruling regarding the manner in which a March 2020 trial will proceed.

What happens when a witness has a criminal past or questionable credibility? Drawing from mock trials in Uzbekistan and real corruption cases, this exploration reveals why confronting a witness's flaws directly—rather than hiding them—can be the key to winning over a jury and preserving credibility in the courtroom.