3,988 results found

In the recent case of 'E-merge Tech Global Services Pvt. Ltd. v. M.R. Vindhyasagar & Anr., the Hon'ble High Court of Madras ('Madras HC') has explained the circumstances...

The Delhi High Court has held that two Indian parties may normally choose foreign law to govern the substantive dispute between them in arbitration proceedings...

Rule against bias is one of the fundamental principles of natural justice which applies to all proceedings, compliance with which is the pivot point of a judicial process.

The Hon'ble Supreme Court vide its judgement dated December 10, 2019, has clarified the position of intermediaries under Section 79 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 prior to its amendment.

The Hon'ble Supreme Court of India settled the question of enforceability of a foreign arbitral award in Amazon.com NV Investment Holdings LLC v. Future Retail Limited and Ors...

The Bombay High Court, vide its judgment dated 23 December 2025 in Om Shri Sai Sra Co-operative Housing Society v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.

Parliamentary privilege, enshrined in the Constitution of India, plays a vital role in fostering deliberative democracy within a parliamentary system. It ensures that legislators can freely express their opinions

The usual manner in which litigating parties seek to condone delays in filing various proceedings, and explaining the delay in filing such proceeding only after the prescribed period of limitation, has been deprecated.

The Supreme Court (Court) on 25 September 2025, in Sanjabij Tari v. Kishore S. Borcar & Anr., examined the presumptions under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (NI Act) and clarified the law on the complainant's financial capacity in cheque dishonour cases.

The judgment of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in Abhijit Mishra v. Wipro Limited [CS(OS) 31/2021], delivered on 14 July 2025, deals with the interplay between contractual termination rights in private employment and the tort of civil defamation.

The issue before the Supreme Court was whether an order refusing to condone delay in filing a setting aside application is an appealable order under the 1996 Act.

In the recent decision of The Project Director, NHAI v. M. Hakeem and Anr., the Hon'ble Supreme Court held that a court is not empowered to modify an award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

In a significant decision, the Bombay High Court on Tuesday quashed and set aside a notification by the Election Commission of India dated March 16, 2024.

This article discusses the power of the court to modify the arbitral award under the Arbitration Act 1940 (erstwhile act) and the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The Bombay High Court has reiterated that communications between a lawyer and client are privileged and cannot be disclosed to a third party without the express consent of the client.

In line with the recent assurances from the Finance Minister of India regarding ending the tax harassment, the CBDT which is the apex body for administration of direct tax in India, has issued 2 circulars.

On 18th May 2020, the CGPDTM, Mumbai issued a Public Notice regarding the timeline/periods as prescribed under the IP Acts and Rules

Last few years have witnessed a significant hike in number of frivolous criminal complaints being filed to settle civil disputes.