Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 AUGUST 2021

Modification Of Arbitral Awards: Supreme Court Reiterates No Interference Approach

Phoenix Legal
Phoenix Legal
Contributor
Phoenix Legal

Phoenix Legal

Phoenix Legal is a leading full-service Indian law firm, founded in 2008, providing comprehensive...

View firm profile
Explore more from Phoenix Legal

In the recent decision of The Project Director, NHAI v. M. Hakeem and Anr., the Hon'ble Supreme Court held that a court is not empowered to modify an award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In the recent decision of The Project Director, NHAI v. M. Hakeem and Anr., the Hon'ble Supreme Court held that a court is not empowered to modify an award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Arbitration Act). The present article briefly examines the findings of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the aforementioned matter.

Brief Facts

All the appeals in the instant matter concern notifications issues under the National Highways Act and arbitral awards passed thereunder. Under the National Highways Act, 1956 (National Highways Act) the competent authority determines the amount of compensation for the land acquired for constructing highways. If the parties are not satisfied with the compensation, they may file an application to refer the matter to an arbitrator who is appointed by the Central Government. In the instant matter, abysmally low amounts were granted by the competent authority which were then upheld by the arbitrator. Consequently,

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from