Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 MARCH 2021

Maintainability Of An Appeal Under Section 37 Of Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996

Khaitan & Co.
Khaitan & Co.
Contributor
Khaitan & Co.

Khaitan & Co.

Founded in 1911, Khaitan & Co is a heritage law firm that has been a trusted adviser to leading...

View firm profile
Explore more from Khaitan & Co.

The issue before the Supreme Court was whether an order refusing to condone delay in filing a setting aside application is an appealable order under the 1996 Act.

IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

INTRODUCTION

A three-judge bench of the Supreme Court of India (Supreme Court), comprising Justices R.F. Nariman, Navin Sinha, and K.M. Joseph, vide a judgment dated 11 February 2021 in the case of Chintels India Limited v Bhayana Builders Private Limited held that an appeal under Section 37(1)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (1996 Act) is maintainable against an order refusing to condone delay in filing a setting aside application under Section 34 of the 1996 Act.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

The Appellant filed a petition before the High Court of Delhi (High Court) to set aside an award passed by the Arbitral Tribunal accompanied by an application seeking condonation of delay of 28 days in filing and 16 days in re-filing the petition. However, vide order and judgment dated 4 June 2020, the learned single judge of the High Court dismissed the application for condonation of delay, and consequently the setting aside petition, as the same was beyond the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this document does not necessarily reflect the views / position of Khaitan & Co but remain solely those of the author(s). For any further queries or follow up, please contact Khaitan & Co at [email protected].

See more popular content from