3,988 results found

In January 2020, Delhi High Court dismissed an appeal by Sun Pharma Laboratories against an order passed by the trial court whereby the latter...

Recently the Bombay High Court decided a trademark dispute involving tobacco majors like ITC and GTC, a flagship of Dalmia Group as parties. The ruling of the Court in the specific case is that a trademark cannot be claimed on common, descriptive English words.

A trade mark with the status of a "well-known" significantly improves the extent of protection as it provides the proprietor, the exclusive right to the trade mark against all unlawful users thereof, regardless of the differences in the field of business, goods or services.

This article summarises the judgment of High Court of Bombay dated 5th May 2017 in the case "Ajanta Pharma Ltd. v Theon Pharmaceuticals Ltd.".

In Cargil India Private Limited v M/s. M.M. Oil Enterprises (Notice of Motion No 1107 of 2019 in COMIP No. 425 of 2017), the Bombay High Court (Court) has once again passed a notable order whereby the Court imposed a sentence ...

At least the Delhi High Court thinks so. In a recent judgment passed by the Delhi High Court in the case of The Chancellor, Masters & Scholars of the University of Oxford & Others Vs. Rameshwari Photocopy Services & Another, . . .

The goodwill of a business is a recognized form of property and it can be protected against infringement by others by process of law. The difficulty lies in the fact that goodwill though can be described, is very difficult to define.

In yet another case the question as to the superiority of use over registration of a trademark came up for decision before the Delhi High Court.

The abolishment of various Boards and Appellate Tribunals by Tribunals Reforms (Rationalization and Conditions of Service) Ordinance, 2021 was promulgated by the President of India in April, 2021.

It is a known fact that Indian courts, in relation to IPR infringement cases, are prone to granting interim/ex-parte interim injunctions for putting an immediate bar over such an alleged violation.

In an era where digital technology allows for unparalleled imitation and manipulation, safeguarding personality rights has become increasingly crucial.

In the recent case of Holland Company LP & Anr. vs. S.P. Industries, the Delhi High Court vide its order dated July 27, 2017, disposed off the application filed by the Holland Company LP seeking injunction to ...

In this case, an individual namely, Tarun Tyagi filed the present petition for quashing an order passed by the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate on November 6, 2013 in the matter.

The case was proceeded ex-parte against the Defendants, who did not appear in Court despite service.

Recently, the Delhi High Court adjudicated upon a case of trademark infringement in the case of Surrendra Malik v. Facebook Inc & Ors., where Surrendra Malik was seeking removal of infringing content by intermediaries ...

In this case, the plaintiff filed a suit seeking relief of permanent injunction and to restrain the defendants from infringing its trademark.

Monsanto entered into a sublicense agreement dated 21.02.2004 with Nuziveedu for 10 years. The agreement was extended and was ultimately terminated by Monsanto on 14.11.2015 due to disputes regarding payment of licence fee.

Patanjali Ayurved Limited ("Patanjali") need not be introduced anymore for its desi products dominate Indian as well as international households.