75 results found

On 27 November 2017 the Tel Aviv District Court handed down a ruling denying a petition for an interlocutory injunction order which would have prevented the respondents in the case from using the name Voice of Hope as regards a particular radio station's activity in Israel

The applicants filed a request for approval of a class action suit against a company traded on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange ("Company") due to an alleged failure to timely file an Immediate Report...

In a decision of the Israeli Supreme Court dated May 16, 2004, in the matter of L.C.A. 502/04 <I>Buffalo Boots GMBH et al. v. Gali—Chain of Shoe Stores</I> (TK-Supreme 2004(2), 1627), it was held, <I>inter alia</I>, that in order to establish that the enrichment of the defendant is unjust, it should be proven that an "additional element" exists (as previously held by the Court in L.C.A. 5768/94, 5614/95, 993/96 <I>A.SH.I.R Import Manufacture & Distribution et al. v. Forum Cons

In a Supreme Court decision handed down on 15th September 2013 which serves as a precedent, judges ruled on one of the most repeated disputes which the lower Courts have dealt with in the past few years, ...

In a precedential ruling, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has affirmed the decision of a Trademark Examining Attorney.

The Israeli Supreme Court ("Supreme Court") held that a company may have independent standing in a shareholder derivative suit, but only in the event that the derivative claimant's actions have a high probability...

PDO's provide legal, almost trademark – like, protection to certain exclusive products, spirits and alcoholic beverages under the legislation of certain countries.

In Habitat Ltd v Habitat International the Tel Aviv District Court under Judge Altuvia rejected a trademark infringement claim which had been filed by Mr Meerovich, the owner of a local furniture chain...

In the last 25 years, the common ruling in Israeli courts was the judgment in the Apropim case by retired Chief Justice Aharon Barak, according to which the interpretation of a...

The Supreme Court allowed an appeal filed by The Manufacturers Association of Israel, but denied that filed by Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., thereby determining that MSD's patent term extension for ezetimibe has expired.

With litigation involving global corporations gaining unprecedented prominence in Israel, becoming acquainted with Israeli litigation practices could offer significant advantages for companies and individuals already operating in, or considering entering the Israeli market.

This judgement has a significant influence on the handling of the defence against a motion to certify a claim as a Class Action, as will be detailed below.

I kick off the New Year with this the first of my case reviews in my new occasional series: "Lessons to Be Learnt- An Occasional Review of Recent UDRP Decisions".

Open Source Use under GPL License.

Validity Of An Exemption Clause In A Debt Arrangement That Limits A Future Claim Against Directors.

Holder Of A Floating Lien As A Regular Creditor.

Validity Of An Exemption Clause In A Debt Arrangement That Limits A Future Claim Against Directors (Hebrew)